Kernel vulnerability

[Avi Kivity]

Dave Jones wrote:
>
>  
>  > Maybe you should send out a "not vulnerable" advisory instead. 
>  > Needlessly patching systems is more work for you, for admins, and for
>  > users, and increases the risk of unwanted breakage.
>
> Whilst we believe we've analysed all possible attack vectors for
> this bug, there is always the possibility we've missed something, so
> it's better safe than sorry.
>

I'll agree with that.  Thank you for your vigilance.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function