Pull off AIGLX repoistory?

[Gerald Henriksen]

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:37:22 -0400, you wrote:

>On Wednesday 26 July 2006 13:30, Denis Leroy wrote:
>> This goes beyond binary-only drivers. What if you were using FC-5 as a
>> major development platform for your own Xorg-based application (or
>> gnome, or kde), then an FC-5 update breaks your code in a major way...
>
>And you really shouldn't be using a Fedora release as a Major Development 
>Platform.  That's not what Fedora is designed and meant to be.  That's a far 
>better job for RHEL where you've got promised ABI/API stability, a very long 
>lifespan, and a lot of effort to ensure things don't change with the updates.  
>Fedora is a more free flowing tool for evaluating technology, where things 
>can and do churn, change, and sometimes break.

So does this mean objective number 4 should be removed from the
Objectives of the Fedora Project page?

"Provide a robust development platform for building software,
particularly open source software."
http://fedora.redhat.com/about/objectives.html