[RHEL5 PATCH 1/2] Fix RAID5 components

Prarit Bhargava prarit at redhat.com
Fri Jul 28 22:40:47 UTC 2006



Aron Griffis wrote:
> Prarit Bhargava wrote: [Fri Jul 28 2006, 10:24:53AM EDT]
>   
>> +config MD_RAID5_IA64
>> +	bool "RAID 5 support for IA64"
>> +	depends on MD_RAID456 && IA64
>> +	default y
>> +	---help---
>> +	Say "Y" if you plan on using RAID5 in IA64
>> +
>>     
>
> This looks wrong to me.  If somebody selects CONFIG_RAID456 on ia64
> then clearly they're intending to use it on ia64.
>
>   
The issue is that CONFIG_RAID456 is tristate, and if it's config'd as a 
module, then
#ifdef CONFIG_RAID456 is not true.

> One option would be to remove the quoted description ("RAID 5 support
> for IA64") then it wouldn't show up in the menu and would be
> automatically selected if the conditions were met.  But it's still
> adding an arch-specific depend in a generic Kconfig, so I don't think
> it's the right answer.
>
>   
Yeah ... I was thinking about that too.  Maybe the option does belong in 
the arch specific stuff.

(In hindsight maybe I should have RFC'd this ;) )
>> This looks wrong too.  Since this is in arch/ia64, there's should be
>> no need to have an arch-specific lib-$(CONFIG_MD_RAID5_IA64), the old
>> invocation should work fine.
>>
>>     
See above comment about MD_RAID456 = m ...  It definately does not work.

>> Could you explain what is wrong presently so we can find the right
>> solution?
>>
>>     
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196903
>> Thanks,
>> Aron
>>     




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list