[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Moving gkrellm to Extras?



> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Hans de Goede (j w r degoede hhs nl) said: 
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Some time ago there was mention of moving gkrellm to Extras in the
> >> Moving ImageMagick to Extras thread.
> >>
> >> I volunteered to maintain gkrellm and put it through the review process.
> >> But I've had no response sofar. Does this mean gkrelmm is going to stay
> >> in Core? Thats fine with me too.
> > 
> > I'm ok with it in Extras from a logical point of view, leaving aside
> > any maintainership/review issues.
> > 
> 
> It doesn't really matter much to me, it seems well taken care of in
> Core, but as said if the maintainer wants to get his hands free for
> something else, then I'm game.

It is a really low maintenance package, but I have no objections against
moving it to Extras. It's yours if you'd like to have it.

  Karsten

> 
> It could really use a cleanup packaging wise though. The wireless plugin
> really should be packaged seperatly.
> 

Yes, it is easier to get a new package in Extras than it is in RHEL ;-)

   Karsten

--
 Karsten Hopp <karsten redhat de>   GPG 1024D/70ABD02C
 Fingerprint D2D4 3B6B 2DE4 464C A432 210A DFF8 A140 70AB D02C
 Red Hat Deutschland, Hauptstaetter Str.58
 70178 Stuttgart, Tel.+49-711-96437-0, Fax +49-711-96437-111


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]