[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: improving rpm



Toshio Kuratomi <toshio tiki-lounge com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 15:24 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> > I was quite interested when I saw the announcement of conary, which solves
> > this problem by allowing local changes tracked as patches.

> > It occurs to me that we can get most of the benefit if rpm is modified
> > to do two things.

> > 1) Don't create needless .rpmsave/.rpmnew if there is no change

> This is a bug.  When I first started using rpm it followed its
> documented behaviour... which is to not create these files.  Recently
> (and by recently I mean sometime in the RHL era :-) some packages have
> begun to create rpmsave/rpmnew where the md5sum of the config files are
> the same between packages.

It was mentioned that this might reflect ownership/mode changes. I would
vote for just changing those (and printing a warning) in that case, if the
file contents is the same.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]