[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: yum+ldconfig



On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 07:22:31PM +0200, dragoran wrote:

> ok than change it in rpm (there should be no diff.) the result would be 
> in both cases faster updates.

Bad idea either.  What about the following:

package A is installed/upgraded
%post A: runs ldconfig
package B is installed/upgraded
%post B: uses utility of A that needs a library of A

There is no magic intelligence that could see if the %post install
can be postponed, because a subsequent installed package may need
its result (even that of ldconfig) during its installation.

B.t.w., did you measure what (percentage of) time could be won when
collecting the ldconfig calls?  I really don't think it's worth the
pain...

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos xos nl>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]