Anyone interested in maintaining 'freeglut' in Fedora Extras?
Mike A. Harris
mharris at mharris.ca
Tue Jul 25 08:51:16 UTC 2006
Nicholas Miell wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 03:25 -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>> Michael J. Knox wrote:
>>> Mike A. Harris wrote:
>>>> There is no longer anything in Core which links to glut/freeglut,
>>>> however there seems to be packages in Fedora Extras which do.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone interested in maintaining freeglut in Extras? It's relatively
>>>> low maintenance - more or less because they only release a new version
>>>> once every 18 years, so not much to do. It gets very very few bug
>>>> reports too (Only 2 or 3 in 3-4 years).
>>>>
>>>> If anyone's interested, please email me back.
>>> Hey Mike, as mentioned in IRC, I will do it.. if no one else wants it.
>> It turns out that my dependency scan missed a dep. The 'glxinfo' and
>> 'glx-gears' utilities both link to libglut. These utils are part of
>> the MesaDemos sub-tarball which is built as part of the mesa package.
>>
>> It would be nice to rid Core of dependencies on glut, but unfortunately
>> while glx-gears is something that could arguably be moved to Extras as
>> being non-essential, glxinfo is a diagnostic utility which should be
>> provided by the Core OS. As such, for the time being at least, we will
>> continue to ship freeglut, glxinfo, and glx-gears in Fedora Core.
>>
>> Package maintainers are however strongly encouraged to NOT link
>> noncritical apps in Core to glut or freeglut libs in Core packages as
>> we would like to move glut to Extras sometime in the future anyway.
>> This doesn't affect any apps in Extras though, just Core.
>>
>
> Good news!
>
> $ ldd -r -u /usr/bin/glx*
> /usr/bin/glxgears:
> Unused direct dependencies:
> /usr/lib64/libglut.so.3
> /usr/lib64/libGLU.so.1
> /usr/bin/glxinfo:
> Unused direct dependencies:
> /usr/lib64/libglut.so.3
> /lib64/libm.so.6
>
> The dependency looks to be purely a linking error.
Hrrm.... you know... I thought it was odd that libglut was linked
into these apps, but not hard enough to investigate wether it was in
err or not.
Having a closer look now...
--
Mike A. Harris * Open Source Advocate * http://mharris.ca
Proud Canadian.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list