Pull off AIGLX repoistory?

[Denis Leroy]

Rahul wrote:
> dragoran wrote:
> 
>> Rahul wrote:
>>
>>> dragoran wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=946216&postcount=4
>>>> but this should not stop you from realeasing xorg-7.1
>>>> if someone for (whatever reason) don't wont to use it they should 
>>>> still wait until updated drivers are available.
>>>> but we should atleast inform user that the new X will break their 
>>>> drivers (fedoranews)
>>>> but silently break things _is_ wrong
>>>
>>>
>>> Should we also put out notices every time a kernel updates breaks 
>>> non-free third party kernel modules?
>>>
>> if we know that it will break a module that many users use than why not?
> 
> 
> We dont test out proprietary software against any update produced by 
> Fedora. Why should Xorg or kernel updates be a exception?

We are not talking about a formal test process. But if we do have the 
information (about an update breaking a popular proprietary package), I 
don't see why we should intentionally withhold it.

Also, if we have a group of volunteers willing to test popular 
proprietary packages (PPPs), I also don't see how it hurts anyone. I do 
use VMWare extensively for all my OSS development and packaging, 
certainly I'm willing to test new kernel update candidates...

-denis