[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Pull off AIGLX repoistory?



On 7/26/06, Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com> wrote:
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 13:30, Denis Leroy wrote:
> This goes beyond binary-only drivers. What if you were using FC-5 as a
> major development platform for your own Xorg-based application (or
> gnome, or kde), then an FC-5 update breaks your code in a major way...

And you really shouldn't be using a Fedora release as a Major Development
Platform.  That's not what Fedora is designed and meant to be.  That's a far
better job for RHEL where you've got promised ABI/API stability, a very long
lifespan, and a lot of effort to ensure things don't change with the updates.
Fedora is a more free flowing tool for evaluating technology, where things
can and do churn, change, and sometimes break.

[updates-testing] would be the perfect place to first release the
X.Org 7.1 updates for FC5 and it might even get a few more people to
help test things there.  What exactly will happen to a user who has
nvidia or ATI drivers installed on FC5?  Will X.Org revert to the open
source drivers or simply crash?

Benjy


--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]