Recent AIGLX Breakage?

[dragoran]

Thomas J. Baker wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 16:16 +0200, dragoran wrote:
>   
>> Thomas J. Baker wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 09:32 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> On 5/31/06, Thomas J. Baker <tjb at unh.edu> wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> Fixed with today's update. Menus are a much too translucent though...
>>>>> Would that be metacity or something else?
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Assuming you define 'too translucent' like I do, meaning any
>>>> translucency at all, the fix is to turn off the bling completely.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --jef"So who is going to sponsor the usability study to determine the
>>>> best level of default transparency percentage down to the fifth
>>>> significant digit? I simply can't wait to read over the minutia of
>>>> that discussion. blaaaaah"spaleta
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193655
>>>
>>> At first blush, being a bling fanboy, I thought it was just too much
>>> translucency and could be tweaked. The more I think about it though, the
>>> more I lean towards menus not being translucent at all.
>>>
>>> tjb
>>>   
>>>       
>> any screenshot?
>>
>>     
>
> http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb/Screenshot.png
>
> tjb
>   
ok thats a joke ...
how about making the this optional?
menu translucent? yes - no
if yes xx%