rpm packaging guideline question: differentiating between live/chroot installs?

Jesse Keating jkeating at j2solutions.net
Fri Jun 23 03:09:11 UTC 2006


On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 19:02 -0700, Jane Dogalt wrote:
> 
> I forgot to add in first reply-
> 
> Does this mean that pre/post(un) scripts should be
> policywise-forbidden from
> doing anything which directly or indirectly tries to touch /proc,
> which in a
> chrooted environment, will not be mounted?  I have this hunch that
> I've run
> into rpms which do try to touch proc, though off the top of my head I
> can't
> point any fingers. 

/proc and a few other things often get mounted into chroot environments,
as they are needed.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060622/69bad02f/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list