Recent AIGLX Breakage?

[Rudolf Kastl]

2006/6/1, dragoran <dragoran at feuerpokemon.de>:
> Thomas J. Baker wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 16:16 +0200, dragoran wrote:
> >
> >> Thomas J. Baker wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 09:32 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On 5/31/06, Thomas J. Baker <tjb at unh.edu> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Fixed with today's update. Menus are a much too translucent though...
> >>>>> Would that be metacity or something else?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Assuming you define 'too translucent' like I do, meaning any
> >>>> translucency at all, the fix is to turn off the bling completely.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --jef"So who is going to sponsor the usability study to determine the
> >>>> best level of default transparency percentage down to the fifth
> >>>> significant digit? I simply can't wait to read over the minutia of
> >>>> that discussion. blaaaaah"spaleta
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193655
> >>>
> >>> At first blush, being a bling fanboy, I thought it was just too much
> >>> translucency and could be tweaked. The more I think about it though, the
> >>> more I lean towards menus not being translucent at all.
> >>>
> >>> tjb
> >>>
> >>>
> >> any screenshot?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb/Screenshot.png
> >
> > tjb
> >
> ok thats a joke ...
> how about making the this optional?
> menu translucent? yes - no
> if yes xx%
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>

configureable is always better than hardcoded.

regards,
Rudolf Kastl