[Fedora-i18n-list] PROPOSAL: restructure the choice of input methods

Jens Petersen petersen at redhat.com
Tue Jun 6 06:31:50 UTC 2006


Akira TAGOH wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:57:14 +0900,
>>>>>> "JP" == Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> wrote:

> JP> I would like to suggest using "/etc/X11/xinit/xinputrc" for the system
> JP> file instead of "/etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/default", since that seems
> JP> more consistent and logical IMHO.
> 
> Well, can you explain more details how it works?
> right now all xinput scripts such as scim, uim etc etc is
> put under /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d and symlinks for
> alternatives as well. are you suggesting to just replace
> /etc/X11/xinit/xinit.d/default to /etc/X11/xinit/xinputrc?
> i.e. alternatives --install /etc/X11/xinit/xinputrc
> xinput-default /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/scim 81?

Ah, you're right I hadn't thought it through clearly enough.
So we need to keep "/etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/" as you say,
but I still think it is a good idea to move 
"/etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/default" to "/etc/X11/xinit/xinputrc".

> JP> So basically the current locale selecting code in xinput.sh will move
> JP> to this alternative script for xim client setup.  We could also
> JP> consider renaming "/etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/" to say
> JP> "/etc/X11/xinit/xim.d/" at the same time: that would avoid confusion
> JP> between the old xinput.d system and the new xinputrc system.
> 
> Sounds good - then where should be xinput scripts put onto?

So then maybe it is better to just keep everything in "xinput.d/" or 
rename it to "xinputrc.d/"?

Jens




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list