Bluez-liibs-3.0 in FC6?

David Woodhouse dwmw2 at
Sat Jun 10 22:45:34 UTC 2006

On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 00:36 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> the Bluetooth library from bluez-libs-3.0 is fully backward compatible,
> but our use of the library version info in bluez-libs-2.x was actually
> kinda broken and so I decided to have a new clean start. I now this is
> going to make some trouble now, but in the long run it is worth it.


> > Should we go ahead and update it, then also rebuild libbtctl,
> > gnome-bluetooth, etc?
> I would prefer that.
> > And would someone _please_ take bluez-pin off my hands -- I know nothing
> > about dbus and GTK+, and except for the dbus requests, bluez-pin doesn't
> > really interact with the _Bluetooth_ stuff at all.
> Drop it at all. It is no longer working anymore. We need something new
> and I am going to release a bluez-gnome package really soon.

In the context of Fedora Core 6 Test 1, 'really soon' needs to be within
about three days, I believe¹. If bluez-libs-3.0 breaks bluez-pin, and if
we don't have a replacement yet, then I think we need to stick with what
we have now.



More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list