wpa_supplicant support for ifup

[Michael H. Warfield]

On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 12:26 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Harald Hoyer (harald at redhat.com) said: 
> > What do you think about the attached patch to ifup-wireless? Works for me :)

> This should really be done in NM.

	Some of us would prefer to avoid being plagued by NM.  It
(wpa_supplicant) works just fine, independent of NM and I've just got it
hooked in the bottom of the ifup scripts as they describe doing on the
project site.  So far, I haven't found a problem that NM solves for me
and a few that it creates for me.  NM and wpa_supplicant should each be
optional and orthogonal to each other.

> Bill

	Mike
-- 
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 |  mhw at WittsEnd.com
   /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/          | (678) 463-0932 |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
   NIC whois: MHW9          | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471        | possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 309 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060314/c905038f/attachment.sig>