aiglx

[Mike A. Harris]

Benjy Grogan wrote:
> Isn't Red Hat forking the accelerated GL community by working on AIGLX 
> instead of Xgl?

No.  Aside from that though, Xgl benefits from the work being done on
aiglx.

> It seems like Xgl is to AIGLX as SELinux is to AppArmor.

That would be a giant misconception on your part.


> It would be great if Red Hat and Novell could convene under a big tent 
> and agree to work on SELinux for security and Xgl for accelereated GL.

You don't seem to understand the problem domain very well.  Might
be worth educating yourself on exactly what Xgl is, and exactly
what accelerated indirect rendering is before formulating grossly
ignorant opinions.



-- 
Mike A. Harris  *  Open Source Advocate  *  http://mharris.ca
                       Proud Canadian.