Wild and crazy times for the development tree

[Callum Lerwick]

On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 20:23 -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Personally, I think it would be confusing as hell to have a single
> src.rpm generate binary rpms of which some are in Fedora Core and
> others are in Fedora Extras.  That would be made more confusing
> since Fedora has separate bugzilla product/etc. for Core and for
> Extras (and for Legacy).  Since bugzilla components themselves are
> based from the name of the src.rpm, one would have to file a bug
> report from a binary package from extras against Fedora Core for the
> src.rpm it was built from.
> 
> I can think of other complications and confusion that would ensue
> as well.  I'm not sure what to suggest to solve those issues however.

Less separation between core and extras. Like maybe none. (cough Debian
cough)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060320/d970240b/attachment.sig>