Broken bind (Re: rawhide report: 20060321 changes)
Jesse Keating
jkeating at j2solutions.net
Wed Mar 22 21:42:03 UTC 2006
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 09:34, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> > Did you have a custom /etc/named.conf prior to the upgrade?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Did the upgrade remove this file?
>
> No. It will be biggest bug than currently existing.
>
> > Do you still have /etc/named.conf on your system and bind
> > is refusing to use that and uses the /etc/named.caching-nameserver.conf ?
> >
> >
> > # ls /var/named/chroot/etc/ -1; ps aux | grep named
>
> localtime
> named.caching-nameserver.conf.
> named.conf
> named.conf~
> named.conf.old
> named.conf~.org
> named.conf.rpmnew
> named.custom
> named.rfc1912.zones
> rndc.conf
> rndc.key
> rndc.key.rpmnew
> named 1514 0.2 0.2 72464 12152 ? Ssl 12:11
> 0:56 /usr/sbin/named -u named -n 2 -t /var/named/chroot
> kloczek 27335 0.0 0.0 58076 800 pts/13 S+ 18:28 0:00 less
> named.init
>
> named.caching-nameserver.conf is not used only because now it dos not
> exist (just renamed as you see).
Wait, you're talking about the files in the chroot.
Jason, did you test this?
Tomasz, before (or if) you renamed the named.caching-nameserver.conf, did
named prefer this file over your modified named.conf ?
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060322/ff277593/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list