Broken bind (Re: rawhide report: 20060321 changes)

Jesse Keating jkeating at j2solutions.net
Wed Mar 22 21:42:03 UTC 2006


On Wednesday 22 March 2006 09:34, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> > Did you have a custom /etc/named.conf prior to the upgrade?
>
> Yes.
>
> >   Did the upgrade remove this file?
>
> No. It will be biggest bug than currently existing.
>
> >   Do you still have /etc/named.conf on your system and bind
> > is refusing to use that and uses the /etc/named.caching-nameserver.conf ?
> >
> >
> > # ls  /var/named/chroot/etc/ -1; ps aux | grep named
>
> localtime
> named.caching-nameserver.conf.
> named.conf
> named.conf~
> named.conf.old
> named.conf~.org
> named.conf.rpmnew
> named.custom
> named.rfc1912.zones
> rndc.conf
> rndc.key
> rndc.key.rpmnew
> named     1514  0.2  0.2  72464 12152 ?        Ssl  12:11
> 0:56 /usr/sbin/named -u named -n 2 -t /var/named/chroot
> kloczek  27335  0.0  0.0  58076   800 pts/13   S+   18:28   0:00 less
> named.init
>
> named.caching-nameserver.conf is not used only because now it dos not
> exist (just renamed as you see).

Wait, you're talking about the files in the chroot.

Jason, did you test this?

Tomasz, before (or if) you renamed the named.caching-nameserver.conf, did 
named prefer this file over your modified named.conf ?

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060322/ff277593/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list