Back to 6 month schedule?

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 19:53 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> But we are working on a distribution that is the base for an Enterprise
> distribution that ships every 18 month afaik. So a strict six months
> release schedule also a benefit for Red Hat afaics.
> 
> >  Some changes take
> > longer to implement than others.  Being tied down to a strict 3 year
> > plan (or longer) does not fit well with what we need.
> 
> Things can be changed if necessary. 
> 

So uh, which do you want?  A strict inflexible schedule, or a flexible
schedule where things can be changed if necessary?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060523/9fa31e62/attachment.sig>