Future Fedora Development

[Peter Gordon]

Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 10:08 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Bernardo Innocenti <bernie at develer.com> said:
>>> What's wrong with GPL programs using the Mozilla implementation?
>>> Last time I checked NSS was totally GPL compatible.
>> mozilla-nss requires mozilla-nspr.  libnss3.so also pulls in
>> libpthread.so.  Those are pretty heavy requirements for SSL.
> 
> Even OpenSSL is so bloaty that the smallest I can get it down to (on
> MIPS, who's code size seem to be about 2x i386) is 1.5mb. Making it
> impossible to fit into the 2mb flash on a belkin router. Sigh.
> 
> There's MatrixSSL, but there's next to nothing that actually uses it...
> 
There's also GnuTLS, which (according to `yum info`) is less than a 
megabyte fully installed. Not sure if fits the requirements for this 
though...

-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
   DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060529/79566357/attachment.sig>