layout of FC5 (and previous) CD's

Peter Bieshaar peter.bieshaar at gmail.com
Thu May 4 08:50:03 UTC 2006


I agree this is inconvenient for me ;) That's why I tried to suggest a
solution for my inconvenience. All I suggested is to have dependent packages
on the same disk, which I think could be done.

2006/5/4, Thomas M Steenholdt <tmus at tmus.dk>:
>
> Peter Bieshaar wrote:
> > I didn't mean previous FC CDs. But keeping rpm's more structured on
> > CD's. So keep the dependent rpm's at least on the same CD. Just did
> > a mysql server installation, needed 2 CDs.
> >
>
> The thing is that although this is inconvenient for you in this case,
> chances are that other packages are depending on some of the same libs
> and it may be hard to fit everything that have interdependencies on a
> single disc, as long as FC is as large as it is atm.
>
> /Thomas
>
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>



--
Peter Bieshaar
NL(0)6 29577255
use this or: peter at bieshaar.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060504/69d91bc7/attachment.htm>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list