rawhide report: 20060509 changes

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Tue May 9 12:37:05 UTC 2006


On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 11:45 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> This is not very descriptive. Are there any guidelines for
> descriptions? 
> (it's a bit disappointing to find that guidelines are necessary for
> this).

This seems to have been included accidentally.  It was supposed to be
built for the OLPC project, but was not quite ready yet (hadn't been
reviewed or anything) for rawhide.  I'm investigating what happened.

> Is there any point in posting patches for old packages? 

I don't follow the question...

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060509/034193b2/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list