Back to 6 month schedule?

[seth vidal]

On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 07:47 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> FC5's 9(10, 11) month schedule was an experiment in adjusting the
> schedule to see if it helped in our release.  While it did allow for
> some larger changes to make it through, it multiplied the amount of
> little changes at the same time.  It created a very bad situation for
> those of us trying to do any kind of QA on the distro before it went out
> the door.  For all those involved, we felt that the 9 month schedule
> hurt more than it helped and we're back to the tried and true 6 month
> schedule, with slips here and there (hopefully not).

Not all of us involved.

I quite liked the 9 month schedule.

-sv