Back to 6 month schedule?

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Tue May 23 17:49:12 UTC 2006


On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 19:41 +0200, Leszek Matok wrote:
> If not us, who's going to report bugs back to them, then? After FC5
> release I saw _only_ FC5 users posting on GNOME's bugzilla about bugs
> I've seen. In less than a month we got many updates, one of them
> incorporated a patch made by myself on my fresh FC5. I'm not an every
> day Fedora or GNOME developer, but the open-source model worked this
> time. Who knows, maybe the 2.14.1 release would have the bug still there
> without FC5 being so bleeding-edge? If you're so scared of testing the
> x.y.0 releases, just wait a month from next Fedora Core release for the
> updates to appear, then use it happily :) 

Or adjust the schedule so that this type of pain can happen in the Test
releases so that we don't inflict broken packages on unsuspecting users.
I really don't like the idea of 'Oh, that's final release, don't use it
for another couple of weeks...'

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060523/2dcbcc43/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list