Future Fedora Development

[Bernardo Innocenti]

Alan Cox wrote:

> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 10:00:26AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>> Yeah, I agree.  OpenSSL seems to be the most comprehensive, but
>> its licence stinks and this is why gnutls was written in the first
>> place.  Now that Mozilla adopted the triple MPL/GPL/LGPL license,
>> there's no reason to keep gnutls any more.
> 
> GNUtls is needed for GPL programs using SSL.

What's wrong with GPL programs using the Mozilla implementation?
Last time I checked NSS was totally GPL compatible.

-- 
  // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/  http://www.develer.com/