Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-05-29

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

Am Dienstag, den 30.05.2006, 13:33 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:53:58 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Mon, 29 May 2006 23:19:01 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > 
> > >> extras Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Mon May 29 23:00:43 CDT 2006
> > >> Number failed to build: 176
> > >> Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 1
> > >> Leaving:  175
> > >> (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)
> > >>
> > >> Of those expected to have worked...
> > >> Without a bug filed: 173
> > >> ----------------------------------
> > >> abe
> > >> alacarte
> > >> amaya
> > >> anjuta-gdl
> > >> balsa
> > > 
> > > -snip-
> > > 
> > > Note sure what the goal of this rebuild attempt is. Extras buildsys uses
> > > mock for a long time. So every package in Extras has built successfully in
> > > mock before. Most (if not all) of the rebuild failures you've caught here
> > > are due to updates in Rawhide, such as compiler updates or API changes.
> > > This report is misleading.
> > 
> > No, it's because he's building the packages with the reduced build 
> > environment that closely matches the exceptions list in the packaging 
> > guidelines rather than default mock configuration that pulls in lots of 
> > extra packages.

See 
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-May/msg00807.html
for further details.

[...]
> Is this modified version of mock ready and available in Extras?

No modified version is required. mdomsch simply uses a local version of
the data at
http://fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/
e.g. a trimmed down version of
http://fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/5/i386/buildroots.xml

CU
thl