I think, rsh is quite obsolete
Chris Adams
cmadams at hiwaay.net
Thu Nov 9 02:42:14 UTC 2006
Once upon a time, Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> said:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:02:12PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> said:
> > > But for Fedora, I can't think of a valid reason why someone would want
> > > to enable a telnetd given the security concerns of non encrypted sessions.
> >
> > For some setups, encryption is not a concern. Besides, FTP, POP3, IMAP,
> > etc. are still included.
>
> These can be wrapped with SSL.
Telnet and rsh can be used over networks that are secured in other ways.
--
Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list