I think, rsh is quite obsolete
Karel Zak
kzak at redhat.com
Thu Nov 9 09:09:50 UTC 2006
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 09:33:47PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:02:12PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> said:
> > > But for Fedora, I can't think of a valid reason why someone would want
> > > to enable a telnetd given the security concerns of non encrypted sessions.
> >
> > For some setups, encryption is not a concern. Besides, FTP, POP3, IMAP,
> > etc. are still included.
>
> These can be wrapped with SSL.
Yes, but do you need it all time and everywhere? I don't know why I
should use SSL if my server and client are on localhost where is my
account only.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak at redhat.com>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list