I think, rsh is quite obsolete

Karel Zak kzak at redhat.com
Thu Nov 9 09:09:50 UTC 2006


On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 09:33:47PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:02:12PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
>  > Once upon a time, Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> said:
>  > > But for Fedora, I can't think of a valid reason why someone would want
>  > > to enable a telnetd given the security concerns of non encrypted sessions.
>  > 
>  > For some setups, encryption is not a concern.  Besides, FTP, POP3, IMAP,
>  > etc. are still included.
> 
> These can be wrapped with SSL.

 Yes, but do you need it all time and everywhere? I don't know why I
 should use SSL if my server and client are on localhost where is my
 account only. 

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak at redhat.com>




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list