Can we make readahead more robust to package updates?
Jeff Spaleta
jspaleta at gmail.com
Mon Nov 13 17:39:08 UTC 2006
On 11/13/06, Karel Zak <kzak at redhat.com> wrote:
> It's means almost all things in /etc/readahead.d/default.* could be
> obsolete after an update (except stable things like /bin/*).
I agree... which is why i think its important to have this discussion
in the list.. instead of just in the bugzilla report. The rpm query
is a neat trick. If you want to pump up a few throwaway readahead
packages to test new ideas to solve this issue, I'll be happy to offer
my system up for inadvertent destruction testing them.
-jef
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list