Can we make readahead more robust to package updates?

Jeffrey C. Ollie jeff at ocjtech.us
Tue Nov 14 15:14:23 UTC 2006


On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 07:35 +0000, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
>
> what about boxens, which are shutdown only on kernel 
> updates? (like mine)

Then you probably don't need readahead - readahead is primarily useful
for those people that boot their systems frequently.

Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20061114/80ebaf09/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list