HZ value changed from 250 to 1000 in the latest updated kernel

Arjan van de Ven arjan at fenrus.demon.nl
Tue Nov 21 12:28:40 UTC 2006


On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 15:12 +0300, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> 
> >A coincidence I hope.  I'm not sure how increased timing resolution could
> >cause the drifting effects you've observed.  I've also not noticed
> >any other similar reports (yet?).
> >
> >		Dave
> >  
> >
> Dave,
> As you have appeared here, could you please comment why HZ was changed?
> 
> I have some confusion on this.
> First, the upstream kernel has this changed (since 2.6.13 ?) in backward 
> direction, i.e. from 1000 to 250.

actually the upstream kernel changed to offer a choice, with 3 options,
1000, 250 and 100. This was done after it was recognized that there are
different valid scenarios for either of those values.

> Second, why Fedora's change is implemented just now (in the middle of 
> life cycle), but not at distro release boundary?

does it matter? This is only internally visible to the kernel, not to
userspace (other than an improvement in accuracy)





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list