gstreamer-plugins-good and (the lack of) taglib

[Denis Leroy]

Rex Dieter wrote:
> Christopher Aillon wrote:
>> Bob Richmond wrote:
>>> The only problem I can think of in introducing this patch is the
>>> dirtiness of making a package from Extras be a build requirement of a
>>> package in core. Is this generally frowned upon?
>> Until the Extras/Core dichotomy is merged, yes.
> 
> Alternatively, you can make some sort of gstreamer-plugins-good-extras
> that includes only the taglib bits, and submit that to Extras.  Not
> ideal, but it should do the trick.

gnome-python2-gda in FE is an example of such a package (a disabled part 
of gnome-pytnon2-extras in Core).