Static linking considered harmful
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Wed Nov 22 10:29:44 UTC 2006
Patrice Dumas writes:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:08:00AM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > We should more proactively discourage static linking in FC7+, for
> > reasons for that see
> > http://people.redhat.com/drepper/no_static_linking.html
> >
> > Removing libc.a would be most effective, but I'm afraid we still need
> > a handful of statically linked binaries for boot time initialization and
> > system recovery utilities.
>
> Not only. There are cases when all those issues are moot, a prominent one
> being for numerical models. Compiling models statically makes it possible
> to run them on any other linux (including different fedora version) box
> without recompiling. So all the libraries that can be used for numerical
> computations should have static libraries kept.
This seems like a non sequitur. What's special about numerical
computations?
Andrew.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list