That much dependences ? (rssowl hell)

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 22 November 2006 19:05, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Isn't this more a "let's stuff everything and the kitchen sink into the
> class library and make it part of the language^W'platform' definition"
> problem than a packaging problem? As Nicolas Mailhot says, packages are
> already broken up, but Java has a "let's require everything" mentality.

Sure, I meant packaged upstream, not downstream.  We can only do so much with 
the crap we have to start with.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20061122/5e630aab/attachment.sig>