That much dependences ? (rssowl hell)

[Andrew Overholt]

* Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> [2006-11-22 17:01]:
> On Wednesday 22 November 2006 16:50, Thomas Canniot wrote:
> > I guess there are some kind of abusive dependences there ?
> >
> > Running up 2 date FC6 i386.
> 
> Welcome to java hell.  The java stuff isn't really packaged well enough to 
> have concise dependencies and instead you wind up with the whole stack.

Yeah right.

It's not that things aren't packaged well enough, it's the the app uses all
sorts of stuff which uses all sorts of other stuff.  Plain and simple.

Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20061122/304bd160/attachment.sig>