Can we make readahead more robust to package updates?
Karel Zak
kzak at redhat.com
Thu Nov 23 12:52:09 UTC 2006
I've created a new project page for readahead (with jkeating's
help:-). It's fine if you edit the wiki page and contribute there.
http://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/readahead/
Note: GIT repo will be available next week.
Karel
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 01:57:57PM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> Okay its come to my attention that the readahead configs have a
> difficult time being kept in sync as package updates roll out. For fc6
> right now for example readahead is out of sync with firefox libraries.
>
> Can we update readahead's implementation so we can get per package
> control of the default configs? Is a readahead.d/ structure
> appropriate here?
>
>
> I want to point out that we lose significant value with read-ahead if
> we can't ensure that the listings will be in-sync as package updates
> are issued. And re-spinning readahead updates periodically to attempt
> to sync a centralized config file is horrible inefficient and may
> never be perfectly in-sync considering the churn of updates during a
> release cycle.
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203329
>
>
> -jef
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Karel Zak <kzak at redhat.com>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list