From kevin.kofler at chello.at Sun Oct 1 01:51:15 2006 From: kevin.kofler at chello.at (Kevin Kofler) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 01:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Firefox trademark shenanigans (Re: Any chance of getting Firefox 2.0 into rawhide/FC6?) References: Message-ID: I've read through the Debian bug report where this very problem is being discussed right now: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354622 I think Mozilla's restrictions on the trademark are a real problem. For example, they don't even tolerate SECURITY updates without explicitly approving every single patch. They have also pretty-much backpedaled from a previous agreement they had with Debian (with the justification that that agreement was with Gerv from the Foundation and now it's the Corporation which decides), who is guaranteeing us that they won't do it to Fedora too? Who's guaranteeing us that they won't refuse to approve an important patch (or worse, ALL new patches) in the future? I'd really suggest following Debian's renaming here (with the same name if possible, to reduce confusion). Kevin Kofler From n0dalus+redhat at gmail.com Sun Oct 1 02:20:14 2006 From: n0dalus+redhat at gmail.com (n0dalus) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:50:14 +0930 Subject: Firefox trademark shenanigans (Re: Any chance of getting Firefox 2.0 into rawhide/FC6?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6280325c0609301920q32e95b2dr3a6175a587c4036d@mail.gmail.com> On 10/1/06, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I've read through the Debian bug report where this very problem is being > discussed right now: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354622 > > I think Mozilla's restrictions on the trademark are a real problem. For > example, they don't even tolerate SECURITY updates without explicitly approving > every single patch. They have also pretty-much backpedaled from a previous > agreement they had with Debian (with the justification that that agreement was > with Gerv from the Foundation and now it's the Corporation which decides), who > is guaranteeing us that they won't do it to Fedora too? Who's guaranteeing us > that they won't refuse to approve an important patch (or worse, ALL new > patches) in the future? I'd really suggest following Debian's renaming here > (with the same name if possible, to reduce confusion). > Firefox is an extremely important brand name in the realm of OSS -- it is more widely known than Fedora or even Linux. When I install a distribution, I expect to see a Firefox icon on the desktop. I think we should keep the Firefox branding, trying to work diplomatically with MozCo. It's possible that now that these issues have surfaced, they will change policies to make things easier for distributions. If one day MozCo stop being cooperative, we can rebrand then -- but I don't think we should rebrand until it becomes a problem (it's not too difficult to release an update that replaces the firefox package). n0dalus. From gilboad at gmail.com Sun Oct 1 02:41:07 2006 From: gilboad at gmail.com (Gilboa Davara) Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 04:41:07 +0200 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 06:01 -0400, buildsys at redhat.com wrote: > vim-2:7.0.109-3 > --------------- > * Thu Sep 28 2006 Jeremy Katz - 7.0.109-3 > - disable vim-spell subpackage as it pushes us over CD boundaries > What-no-why-how-NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Is it being moved to extra? - Gilboa From pemboa at gmail.com Sun Oct 1 03:24:46 2006 From: pemboa at gmail.com (Arthur Pemberton) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:24:46 -0500 Subject: Firefox trademark shenanigans (Re: Any chance of getting Firefox 2.0 into rawhide/FC6?) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <16de708d0609302024h5f7e18c5y8fd2e25e4c366923@mail.gmail.com> On 9/30/06, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I've read through the Debian bug report where this very problem is being > discussed right now: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354622 > > I think Mozilla's restrictions on the trademark are a real problem. For > example, they don't even tolerate SECURITY updates without explicitly approving > every single patch. They have also pretty-much backpedaled from a previous > agreement they had with Debian (with the justification that that agreement was > with Gerv from the Foundation and now it's the Corporation which decides), who > is guaranteeing us that they won't do it to Fedora too? Who's guaranteeing us > that they won't refuse to approve an important patch (or worse, ALL new > patches) in the future? I'd really suggest following Debian's renaming here > (with the same name if possible, to reduce confusion). > > Kevin Kofler > Sorry to jump in here. But from what I've read, it seems that MozCo is cool with Fedora as things stand. As ugly as this entire dispute is, it seems it would be only uglier if this turned into gang bang of sorts. I personally do not use Firfox as my primary browser, but I would hate to see its name tarnished. If it comes to having to rebrand it, I think that should be a last resort. Peace. -- Fedora Core 5 and proud From tdiehl at rogueind.com Sun Oct 1 03:28:38 2006 From: tdiehl at rogueind.com (Tom Diehl) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:28:38 -0400 (EDT) Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> Message-ID: On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 06:01 -0400, buildsys at redhat.com wrote: > >> vim-2:7.0.109-3 >> --------------- >> * Thu Sep 28 2006 Jeremy Katz - 7.0.109-3 >> - disable vim-spell subpackage as it pushes us over CD boundaries >> > > What-no-why-how-NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! > Is it being moved to extra? Not likely, since AFAIK you cannot have just a sub package in extras. The right answer, if you need space is to mv all of emacs to extras. :-) Regards, -- Tom Diehl tdiehl at rogueind.com Spamtrap address mtd123 at rogueind.com From a.badger at gmail.com Sun Oct 1 04:37:02 2006 From: a.badger at gmail.com (Toshio Kuratomi) Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:37:02 -0700 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> Message-ID: <1159677422.13361.4.camel@localhost> On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 23:28 -0400, Tom Diehl wrote: > On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 06:01 -0400, buildsys at redhat.com wrote: > > > >> vim-2:7.0.109-3 > >> --------------- > >> * Thu Sep 28 2006 Jeremy Katz - 7.0.109-3 > >> - disable vim-spell subpackage as it pushes us over CD boundaries > >> > > > > What-no-why-how-NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! > > Is it being moved to extra? > > Not likely, since AFAIK you cannot have just a sub package in extras. > > The right answer, if you need space is to mv all of emacs to extras. :-) You can but it's very messy. The php-extras package in extras is an example. -Toshio -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From sundaram at fedoraproject.org Sun Oct 1 05:47:33 2006 From: sundaram at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Sundaram) Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 11:17:33 +0530 Subject: FC6Pre images relelased! md5sum?? In-Reply-To: References: <1159569047.3314.256.camel@metroid.rdu.redhat.com> Message-ID: <451F5675.3030303@fedoraproject.org> sean wrote: > Will Woods wrote: >> Hello! >> >> As promised, we have pushed FC6 prerelease images to the trackers: >> http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/ >> >> The following install-blocking bugs have been tested and should be fixed >> in these images: >> #206876: GRUB claims initrd is too big for memory on x86_64 >> #206453: installed x86_64/ppc system missing initrd, cannot boot >> #206202: Anaconda traceback during lvcreate on ppc64 >> #206913: Anaconda exception on upgrade from FC5 >> #208080: ahci/ata_piix mixup causes Anaconda to not find SATA disks >> This is not a complete list of bugs fixed, just some of the most >> troublesome installer bugs from Test3. >> >> There *is* a known bug when trying to install using Fedora Extras in >> this release. Luckily we already have a fix for it that you can use with >> these images! Just follow the directions here: >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Updates >> You can get the update image from here: >> http://people.redhat.com/~katzj/updates-fc6pre.img >> This will also help us test the Anaconda Update code, so if you're >> thinking of using Extras, please give it a shot! >> >> Another note: the keyboard won't work in firstboot. The mouse is fine, >> though, so you can click your way through. I believe we already have a >> fix for this, but it just didn't make it in time for this release. >> >> Enjoy the updated images, and happy testing. Be sure to keep your >> newly-installed FC6pre systems up to date and keep on testing as we make >> the final push towards the release of FC6! >> >> -w >> > what's the md5sum?? > > sean The SHA1SUM is within the torrent itself. If you use torrent, you dont have to verify this manually anyway. Rahul From denis at poolshark.org Sun Oct 1 08:26:49 2006 From: denis at poolshark.org (Denis Leroy) Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 10:26:49 +0200 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <1159677422.13361.4.camel@localhost> References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> <1159677422.13361.4.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <451F7BC9.9050607@poolshark.org> Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 23:28 -0400, Tom Diehl wrote: >> On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Gilboa Davara wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 06:01 -0400, buildsys at redhat.com wrote: >>> >>>> vim-2:7.0.109-3 >>>> --------------- >>>> * Thu Sep 28 2006 Jeremy Katz - 7.0.109-3 >>>> - disable vim-spell subpackage as it pushes us over CD boundaries >>>> >>> What-no-why-how-NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! >>> Is it being moved to extra? >> Not likely, since AFAIK you cannot have just a sub package in extras. >> >> The right answer, if you need space is to mv all of emacs to extras. :-) > > You can but it's very messy. The php-extras package in extras is an > example. > gnome-python2-gda also (subpackage of gnome-python-extras), albeit still under review. I wouldn't call it messy, just it requires extra care to stay in sync with Core... :-) -denis From sdl.web at gmail.com Sun Oct 1 09:29:39 2006 From: sdl.web at gmail.com (Leo) Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 10:29:39 +0100 Subject: GNOME 2.16.1 in FC6? References: <451EE3C5.7060804@glezos.com> Message-ID: On Sat, 30/09/06 22:38 +0100, Dimitris Glezos wrote: > GNOME 2.16.1 is released on 4/10 (tarballs due 2/10) and FC6 freeze is on 2/10. > > * http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointFifteen > * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Core/Schedule > > Are we planning on including Gnome 2.16.1 in FC6? > > The Desktop beat and release notes say it's 2.16. Just want to make sure. > > -dim > 2.14.3 is in fc5. Similarly, 2.16.x will be in FC6. -- Leo From gilboad at gmail.com Sun Oct 1 10:03:48 2006 From: gilboad at gmail.com (Gilboa Davara) Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 12:03:48 +0200 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> Message-ID: <1159697028.18420.8.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 23:28 -0400, Tom Diehl wrote: > On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 06:01 -0400, buildsys at redhat.com wrote: > > > >> vim-2:7.0.109-3 > >> --------------- > >> * Thu Sep 28 2006 Jeremy Katz - 7.0.109-3 > >> - disable vim-spell subpackage as it pushes us over CD boundaries > >> > > > > What-no-why-how-NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! > > Is it being moved to extra? > > Not likely, since AFAIK you cannot have just a sub package in extras. > > The right answer, if you need space is to mv all of emacs to extras. :-) > > Regards, > ... IMHO, vim7's spell checking is one of its biggest advantages. Throwing it out just because it doesn't find CD boundary (Does anyone have CD vs. DVD download statistics?) seems much -more- messy in my view. - Gilboa From buildsys at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 10:12:43 2006 From: buildsys at redhat.com (buildsys at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 06:12:43 -0400 Subject: rawhide report: 20061001 changes Message-ID: <200610011012.k91ACh2V025731@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> Updated Packages: (none) Broken deps for s390 ---------------------------------------------------------- systemtap - 0.5.9-1.fc6.s390 requires kernel >= 0:2.6.9-11 From stickster at gmail.com Sun Oct 1 13:34:04 2006 From: stickster at gmail.com (Paul W. Frields) Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 09:34:04 -0400 Subject: WIRELESS 0.3 In-Reply-To: <451EDD09.4080101@leemhuis.info> References: <20060930190133.26292.qmail@web54301.mail.yahoo.com> <1159643420.2597.5.camel@zelda.fubar.dk> <451EC727.4060301@leemhuis.info> <1159648994.15089.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> <451EDD09.4080101@leemhuis.info> Message-ID: <1159709644.8657.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 23:09 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >>> It has been adequately explained why Fedora Core / Extras don't carry > >>> non-free software or why Fedora Core isn't shipping out-of-tree drivers. [...] > >> I'm wondering if we should document this explicitly somewhere in an > >> "official" place. > > Isn't http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems enough? [...] > > Well, I can't see anything about wlan drivers there -- madwifi, which is > really problematic, would fit there really well. > > But it's getting more complicated when it comes to acx and ipw3945, > because even on LKML there are different opinions about their legal > status and if they are acceptable for the kernel. > > And to quote David: "[...]why Fedora Core isn't shipping out-of-tree > drivers" -- this is more a political position and not strictly forbidden > afaics. It should probably be documented somewhere, too. > > I'm working on something in this area for Extras currently that > describes why the best place for kernel-modules is the upstream kernel. > But that's not ready for public consumption yet; parts of that document > probably could be used for a document that explains why Fedora Core > normally does not ship out-of-tree drivers in the kernel. Just make sure that if you must put it somewhere other than ForbiddenItems, you link it from there. Our wiki already needs a lot of cleanup, so fragmenting these issues further complicates that job. Thanks for writing something. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Docs Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From otto_rey at yahoo.com.ar Sun Oct 1 15:17:23 2006 From: otto_rey at yahoo.com.ar (Otto Rey) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 08:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Bluez packages in FC6 Message-ID: <20061001151723.24162.qmail@web52414.mail.yahoo.com> Well... for me, in FC5 i have no problem with Bluetooth Dongle to send and recive files from/to cell phone. I need the same funcionality working correctly on FC6 (now by default ;) ) Otto Rey ----- Original Message ---- From: Josh Boyer To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 6:17:55 PM Subject: Re: Bluez packages in FC6 On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 16:15 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 11:44 +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote: > > If the old stuff is similar to what is in FC5, it is almost useless > > anyway. It is hard to imagine that any kind of change could make it > > worse. > > Can you elaborate? I've used the Bluetooth packages in FC5 almost daily > -- with Bluetooth mouse, GPRS 'dialup' over Bluetooth phone, BNEP > connectivity. I also use gnome-bluetooth to receive files from my phone. > > It doesn't seem 'almost useless' here -- what's wrong with it for you? None of the above works for me. I can get gnome-bluetooth to see the phone, but it never asks for a pin, etc. And as a result, they don't stay paired for more than 60 seconds. I once got a bluetooth mouse to pair. But alas, it's scroll wheel didn't work, and I had to do some non-obvious cmdline stuff to even get it detected in the first place. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list __________________________________________________ Pregunt?. Respond?. Descubr?. Todo lo que quer?as saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, est? en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). ?Probalo ya! http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From otto_rey at yahoo.com.ar Sun Oct 1 15:22:10 2006 From: otto_rey at yahoo.com.ar (Otto Rey) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 08:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: fedora time bug Message-ID: <20061001152210.26849.qmail@web52408.mail.yahoo.com> Jason, did you try it on FC5? Same results? ----- Original Message ---- From: Jay Cliburn To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 2:40:58 PM Subject: Re: fedora time bug DOH!!!! Sorry for the dupes. My mailer lied and said they'd been cancelled before sending. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list __________________________________________________ Pregunt?. Respond?. Descubr?. Todo lo que quer?as saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, est? en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). ?Probalo ya! http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From benny+usenet at amorsen.dk Sun Oct 1 16:52:01 2006 From: benny+usenet at amorsen.dk (Benny Amorsen) Date: 01 Oct 2006 18:52:01 +0200 Subject: Bluez packages in FC6 References: <1159475018.3309.333.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1159629339.6631.13.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Message-ID: >>>>> "DW" == David Woodhouse writes: DW> On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 11:44 +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote: >> If the old stuff is similar to what is in FC5, it is almost useless >> anyway. It is hard to imagine that any kind of change could make it >> worse. DW> Can you elaborate? I've used the Bluetooth packages in FC5 almost DW> daily -- with Bluetooth mouse, GPRS 'dialup' over Bluetooth phone, DW> BNEP connectivity. I also use gnome-bluetooth to receive files DW> from my phone. DW> It doesn't seem 'almost useless' here -- what's wrong with it for DW> you? Pairing is too difficult, and fails randomly. File receive worked for me once, but last time I needed it, it didn't work. No error messages, that's the fun part. If only there were diagnostics; strace and packet dumps are useful at work, but it would be nice to not have to use them at home too. There was no point in putting error reports in bugzilla -- I would have to write something like "the pairing tool isn't working", but there IS no pairing tool. I have cut down my bluetooth usage to just ppp to a cell phone. This works most of the time. (With at most a few tries and perhaps a phone reboot, but then it is an Ericsson.) /Benny From jkeating at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 17:05:18 2006 From: jkeating at redhat.com (Jesse Keating) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:05:18 -0400 Subject: FC5 "rpmbuild -ta" problems In-Reply-To: <801c11610609291737w4c6314eg9e85d004eb94d573@mail.gmail.com> References: <801c11610609290801q4ad3ad60u9481395fac436e1@mail.gmail.com> <1159567952.5120.55.camel@cassandra.boston.redhat.com> <801c11610609291737w4c6314eg9e85d004eb94d573@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200610011305.18204.jkeating@redhat.com> On Friday 29 September 2006 20:37, Marcio Oliveira wrote: > It seems that --wildcards option became required for tar. ?I will test the > patched rpmbuild with earlier tar versions (in FC1, FC2, FC3, FC4 and FC5, > maybe in RH9, RH8, RHEL2.1, RHEL3, RHEL4 ?and RHEL5 Beta too) to confirm if > it supports --wildcards. We reverted tar in FC5 and rawhide. This should solve a lot of the problems that came up. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jkeating at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 17:11:18 2006 From: jkeating at redhat.com (Jesse Keating) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 13:11:18 -0400 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <1159697028.18420.8.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159697028.18420.8.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> Message-ID: <200610011311.19125.jkeating@redhat.com> On Sunday 01 October 2006 06:03, Gilboa Davara wrote: > ... IMHO, vim7's spell checking is one of its biggest advantages. And if it had shown up back before the Feature Freeze this wouldn't be much of a discussion, other than now we have Yet Another complete spell checking system instead of reusing one of the plethora of others out there. But, this subpackage showed up just a short while ago, well beyond the freeze, and did in fact cause CD sizes to spill over, and now there is no time to re-evaluate the situation and find space elsewhere. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dwmw2 at infradead.org Sun Oct 1 19:36:31 2006 From: dwmw2 at infradead.org (David Woodhouse) Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:36:31 +0100 Subject: Bluez packages in FC6 In-Reply-To: <1159651075.2684.7.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> References: <1159475018.3309.333.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1159629339.6631.13.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1159651075.2684.7.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> Message-ID: <1159731391.3257.51.camel@pmac.infradead.org> On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 16:17 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > None of the above works for me. I can get gnome-bluetooth to see the > phone, but it never asks for a pin, etc. And as a result, they don't > stay paired for more than 60 seconds. gnome-bluetooth doesn't actually do anything useful, does it? What were you trying to do? For dialup, you want /etc/bluetooth/rfcomm.conf set up to bind /dev/rfcomm0 to the phone in question, then you just use it with the normal ppp scripts. For synchronisation of addressbook, calendar, etc. you want multisync. For placing and receiving voice calls you want Asterisk and chan_bluetooth. > I once got a bluetooth mouse to pair. But alas, it's scroll wheel > didn't work, Interesting. File a bug, show hcidump output when you were using the scroll wheel. > and I had to do some non-obvious cmdline stuff to even get it detected > in the first place. Yeah, getting nice point-and-drool tools would be nice. They're coming along, slowly. -- dwmw2 From dwmw2 at infradead.org Sun Oct 1 19:42:06 2006 From: dwmw2 at infradead.org (David Woodhouse) Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:42:06 +0100 Subject: Bluez packages in FC6 In-Reply-To: References: <1159475018.3309.333.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1159629339.6631.13.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Message-ID: <1159731726.3257.57.camel@pmac.infradead.org> On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 18:52 +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote: > DW> It doesn't seem 'almost useless' here -- what's wrong with it for > DW> you? > > Pairing is too difficult, and fails randomly. With bluez-utils-3 and bluez-gnome, it should be a lot better. Try it, file bugs if there are problems. > File receive worked for me once, but last time I needed it, it didn't > work. No error messages, that's the fun part. File receive works consistently here -- as long as gnome-obex-server is running, of course. File bugs if you have problems -- we can't fix things we don't know are misbehaving. > If only there were diagnostics; strace and packet > dumps are useful at work, but it would be nice to not have to use them > at home too. I don't know what better diagnostics I'd want than running gnome-obex-server in a terminal so I can see its output, and running hcidump -X -V in another terminal so I can see the traffic. > There was no point in putting error reports in bugzilla -- I would > have to write something like "the pairing tool isn't working", but > there IS no pairing tool. Of course there's a point in putting error reports in bugzilla. There _is_ a pairing tool, and my experience is that it works. In FC-5 it was bluez-pin; in FC-6 it'll be bluez-gnome. > I have cut down my bluetooth usage to just ppp to a cell phone. This > works most of the time. (With at most a few tries and perhaps a phone > reboot, but then it is an Ericsson.) Again -- if it fails, then show the hcidump output and we'll see what's going wrong. -- dwmw2 From kevin.kofler at chello.at Sun Oct 1 20:36:29 2006 From: kevin.kofler at chello.at (Kevin Kofler) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 20:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Firefox trademark shenanigans (Re: Any chance of getting Firefox 2.0 into rawhide/FC6?) References: <16de708d0609302024h5f7e18c5y8fd2e25e4c366923@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Arthur Pemberton gmail.com> writes: > Sorry to jump in here. But from what I've read, it seems that MozCo is > cool with Fedora as things stand. But for how long? I think the patch approval process can also be a constraint on the Fedora Legacy team. Currently, Legacy is simply upgrading rather than backporting, and even working on packaging Seamonkey to replace the discontinued Mozilla Suite for the older distros (that gratuitous name change is also due to Mozilla's trademark policies, by the way), but what if they want to work together with the Debian stable people on backporting fixes instead? I don't think being shackled by a restrictive trademark agreement is what Free Software is about. Also, do you like how Mozilla is using this as an argument to pressure Debian into compliance? "See, Fedora does what we want, why don't you?" I think this places Fedora entirely on the wrong side of the fence. And have you read the thread this one forked from? The trademark arrangement is also one of the reasons F*****x doesn't (always) use the "early testing of development versions in Rawhide" scheme which is successfully used for several other packages (GNOME, kernel, KDE before we got the long-lived 3.5 branch we have now etc.). (Yes, I said "one of", I know Chris Aillon also brought up others.) > I personally do not use Firfox as my primary browser, Neither do I, long live Konqueror! :-) Kevin Kofler From kevin.kofler at chello.at Sun Oct 1 20:41:45 2006 From: kevin.kofler at chello.at (Kevin Kofler) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 20:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> Message-ID: Gilboa Davara gmail.com> writes: > What-no-why-how-NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! > Is it being moved to extra? I'd guess it's certainly possible, and it's probably going to get done faster if you submit it. ;-) Creating an Extras package from a Core subpackage is actually pretty easy, take the Core specfile, disable the build of everything you don't need built for that subpackage, add rm commands for everything else, and use just the file list of the former subpackage. Kevin Kofler From benny+usenet at amorsen.dk Sun Oct 1 21:44:16 2006 From: benny+usenet at amorsen.dk (Benny Amorsen) Date: 01 Oct 2006 23:44:16 +0200 Subject: Bluez packages in FC6 References: <1159475018.3309.333.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1159629339.6631.13.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1159731726.3257.57.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Message-ID: >>>>> "DW" == David Woodhouse writes: DW> I don't know what better diagnostics I'd want than running DW> gnome-obex-server in a terminal so I can see its output, and DW> running hcidump -X -V in another terminal so I can see the DW> traffic. You are right about gnome-obex-server. I should have tried getting output from that last time. Either way, I'll be happy to try the new stuff. At least FC6 is right around the corner, so I guess it's not a great loss if FC5 doesn't get an update. /Benny From rob at choralone.org Sun Oct 1 21:49:11 2006 From: rob at choralone.org (Rob Andrews) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 22:49:11 +0100 Subject: Multilib packages and common identical files issue In-Reply-To: <20060928141635.38198863@python3.es.egwn.lan> References: <20060928120931.6d8356da@python3.es.egwn.lan> <20060928141635.38198863@python3.es.egwn.lan> Message-ID: <20061001214911.GB3843@aphasia.badger.choralone.org> On 28-Sep-2006 13:16.35 (BST), Matthias Saou wrote: > > rpm certainly should be leaving identical common files behind (and it does > > in most cases). If not, then imo, it certainly is a bug. > But it seems like it doesn't... maybe only for "special" files tagged > as documentation or translations. Still, it looks like a bug. If no one > knows of an existing bug report about this problem, I'll file a new one. I don't know if the problem exists with configuration files also, but I've been bitten by this issue a number of times. To the best of my knowledge there isn't a magic flag to rpm to prevent this behaviour. I run a weekly "rpm -qaV 2>&1 | grep ^missing" as a cron job to find a list of files that are missing in case of these situations having arisen. Another situation where this causes issue is when (for whatever reason) yum aborts before the cleanup stage. If you then "rpm -e {name}-{version}-{rel}", the common files between both revisions are purged, so there is no way of cleaning up from that aborted transaction. -- rob andrews :: pgp 0x01e00563 :: rob at choralone.org From katzj at redhat.com Sun Oct 1 23:27:42 2006 From: katzj at redhat.com (Jeremy Katz) Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:27:42 -0400 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> Message-ID: <1159745262.7868.40.camel@aglarond.local> On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 04:41 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 06:01 -0400, buildsys at redhat.com wrote: > > vim-2:7.0.109-3 > > --------------- > > * Thu Sep 28 2006 Jeremy Katz - 7.0.109-3 > > - disable vim-spell subpackage as it pushes us over CD boundaries > > What-no-why-how-NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! > Is it being moved to extra? It was added after the feature freeze without proper consultation of the release team. Beyond that, it pushed us over to needing a sixth CD on x86. And it's a third set of spellcheck data (aspell + OpenOffice already have their own) If someone wants to pick the bits up and maintain them in Extras, it shouldn't be problematic as it's an entirely separate tarball anyway Jeremy From jon.nettleton at gmail.com Mon Oct 2 00:12:38 2006 From: jon.nettleton at gmail.com (Jon Nettleton) Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:12:38 -0400 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> Message-ID: <1159747958.1721.3.camel@averatec> On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:41 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Gilboa Davara gmail.com> writes: > > What-no-why-how-NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! > > Is it being moved to extra? > > I'd guess it's certainly possible, and it's probably going to get done faster > if you submit it. ;-) Creating an Extras package from a Core subpackage is > actually pretty easy, take the Core specfile, disable the build of everything > you don't need built for that subpackage, add rm commands for everything else, > and use just the file list of the former subpackage. I see the use of rm commands all the time in spec files. Can anyone explain why this is used instead of the %exclude directive? Not important, just curious because excluding files seems like a much safer and elegant solution. Jon From pemboa at gmail.com Mon Oct 2 00:26:57 2006 From: pemboa at gmail.com (Arthur Pemberton) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:26:57 -0500 Subject: Firefox trademark shenanigans (Re: Any chance of getting Firefox 2.0 into rawhide/FC6?) In-Reply-To: References: <16de708d0609302024h5f7e18c5y8fd2e25e4c366923@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <16de708d0610011726q26fd81d5me5c04fc6b3e35555@mail.gmail.com> On 10/1/06, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Arthur Pemberton gmail.com> writes: > > Sorry to jump in here. But from what I've read, it seems that MozCo is > > cool with Fedora as things stand. > > But for how long? That we shall see. > I think the patch approval process can also be a constraint > on the Fedora Legacy team. Currently, Legacy is simply upgrading rather than > backporting, Not familiar with the details on the differences between upgrading vs. backporting. Although I would have assumed upgrading was better. > and even working on packaging Seamonkey to replace the > discontinued Mozilla Suite for the older distros (that gratuitous name change > is also due to Mozilla's trademark policies, by the way), This sentence seemed incomple, nevertheless: Seamonkey is my primary browser. Firefox is just my secondary browser. So far, save for the name change, with I didn't really mind, MozCo doesn't "seem" to be hurting Seamonkey much. I was dissapointed that they gave up on the suite, as I am not too much a fan of Firefox, but who am I to complain. As far as I remember, the problem with dependancy on the old suite can be, and is to be solved with migration to xulrunner....here's hoping that works out soon. > but what if they want > to work together with the Debian stable people on backporting fixes instead? I > don't think being shackled by a restrictive trademark agreement is what Free > Software is about. I can agree with that. However, it is my understanding that what truly makes up the software, the code, is still "free". > Also, do you like how Mozilla is using this as an argument to pressure Debian > into compliance? "See, Fedora does what we want, why don't you?" I think this > places Fedora entirely on the wrong side of the fence. I do not really like that myself. I would prefer Fedora not be part of the arguement at all. Like it or not, Fedora is disliked for various reasons by various reasons as it is. We need no more bad press. > And have you read the thread this one forked from? No, hence the initial apology for jumping in. > The trademark arrangement is > also one of the reasons F*****x doesn't (always) use the "early testing of > development versions in Rawhide" scheme which is successfully used for several > other packages (GNOME, kernel, KDE before we got the long-lived 3.5 branch we > have now etc.). (Yes, I said "one of", I know Chris Aillon also brought up > others.) Seems like in the end, this only hurts the Firefox guys. If distros stop patching, and only use vanilla sources when they come along, then sucks for them. > > I personally do not use Firfox as my primary browser, > > Neither do I, long live Konqueror! :-) Long live Seamonkey > > Kevin Kofler -- Fedora Core 5 and proud From jkeating at redhat.com Mon Oct 2 02:19:50 2006 From: jkeating at redhat.com (Jesse Keating) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 22:19:50 -0400 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <1159747958.1721.3.camel@averatec> References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159747958.1721.3.camel@averatec> Message-ID: <200610012219.50431.jkeating@redhat.com> On Sunday 01 October 2006 20:12, Jon Nettleton wrote: > I see the use of rm commands all the time in spec files. ?Can anyone > explain why this is used instead of the %exclude directive? ?Not > important, just curious because excluding files seems like a much safer > and elegant solution. Lack of education? Maybe the developer isn't aware of the %exclude, or would rather just remove the files anyway. I use rm to remove static libraries rather than exclude them. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From vonbrand at inf.utfsm.cl Mon Oct 2 02:53:22 2006 From: vonbrand at inf.utfsm.cl (Horst H. von Brand) Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:53:22 -0400 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: Message from Jesse Keating of "Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:19:50 -0400." <200610012219.50431.jkeating@redhat.com> Message-ID: <200610020253.k922rMYh006443@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sunday 01 October 2006 20:12, Jon Nettleton wrote: > > I see the use of rm commands all the time in spec files. ??Can anyone > > explain why this is used instead of the %exclude directive? ??Not > > important, just curious because excluding files seems like a much safer > > and elegant solution. > Lack of education? Maybe the developer isn't aware of the %exclude, or > would rather just remove the files anyway. I use rm to remove static > libraries rather than exclude them. What is sorely needed is a RPM reference... the "Maximum RPM" book is nice as narrative, but almost useless at the time of designing a new .spec file -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 From a.badger at gmail.com Mon Oct 2 05:03:37 2006 From: a.badger at gmail.com (Toshio Kuratomi) Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:03:37 -0700 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <200610020253.k922rMYh006443@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> References: <200610020253.k922rMYh006443@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> Message-ID: <1159765417.13361.25.camel@localhost> On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 22:53 -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Sunday 01 October 2006 20:12, Jon Nettleton wrote: > > > I see the use of rm commands all the time in spec files. ? Can anyone > > > explain why this is used instead of the %exclude directive? ? Not > > > important, just curious because excluding files seems like a much safer > > > and elegant solution. > > > Lack of education? Maybe the developer isn't aware of the %exclude, or > > would rather just remove the files anyway. I use rm to remove static > > libraries rather than exclude them. > 1) I believe rpm has a bug where %exclude'd files are counted towards the space the installed package will use on the system. 2) http://www.fedora.redhat.com/docs/developers-guide/s1-rpm-more-guidelines.html point #4 discourages fixing the filelist in %files. I don't know how widely disseminated this documentation has been (and the idea behind it is a tad dubious...) > What is sorely needed is a RPM reference... the "Maximum RPM" book is nice > as narrative, but almost useless at the time of designing a new .spec file This would be helpful. But it is a very large task. A start has been made on this several times but I don't know if any of those are stil actively maintaining content. -Toshio -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From denis at poolshark.org Mon Oct 2 06:40:55 2006 From: denis at poolshark.org (Denis Leroy) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:40:55 +0200 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <1159747958.1721.3.camel@averatec> References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> <1159747958.1721.3.camel@averatec> Message-ID: <4520B477.8040308@poolshark.org> Jon Nettleton wrote: > On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:41 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Gilboa Davara gmail.com> writes: >>> What-no-why-how-NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! >>> Is it being moved to extra? >> I'd guess it's certainly possible, and it's probably going to get done faster >> if you submit it. ;-) Creating an Extras package from a Core subpackage is >> actually pretty easy, take the Core specfile, disable the build of everything >> you don't need built for that subpackage, add rm commands for everything else, >> and use just the file list of the former subpackage. > > I see the use of rm commands all the time in spec files. Can anyone > explain why this is used instead of the %exclude directive? Not > important, just curious because excluding files seems like a much safer > and elegant solution. First time i read about this %exclude directive. Does an exhaustive reference of the directives and their options even exist ? -denis From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Mon Oct 2 07:50:56 2006 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:50:56 +0200 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <1159747958.1721.3.camel@averatec> References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> <1159747958.1721.3.camel@averatec> Message-ID: <20061002095056.6a833466.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:12:38 -0400, Jon Nettleton wrote: > I see the use of rm commands all the time in spec files. Can anyone > explain why this is used instead of the %exclude directive? Not > important, just curious because excluding files seems like a much safer > and elegant solution. rpmbuild fails if in the build root no filenames match the %exclude pattern, which can happen when using a single spec file for multiple targets. Hence "rm -f" is safer, because it works fine also with non-existant files. From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Mon Oct 2 08:33:11 2006 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:33:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <20061002095056.6a833466.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> <1159747958.1721.3.camel@averatec> <20061002095056.6a833466.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Message-ID: <9310.192.54.193.51.1159777991.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> Le Lun 2 octobre 2006 09:50, Michael Schwendt a ?crit : > rpmbuild fails if in the build root no filenames match the %exclude > pattern, which can happen when using a single spec file for multiple > targets. Hence "rm -f" is safer, because it works fine also with > non-existant files. replace "safer" with "less work for the lazy packager" there If you expect to remove some files but they're not present *something* changed upstream. Blindly continuing without any packager review certainly isn't the "safe" choice. -- Nicolas Mailhot From krolyn at lycos.com Mon Oct 2 09:18:32 2006 From: krolyn at lycos.com (Krolyn K) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 05:18:32 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Linux Cluster Message-ID: <20061002051832.HM.00000000000000T@krolyn.bos-mail-wwl8.lycos.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jakub at redhat.com Mon Oct 2 10:04:21 2006 From: jakub at redhat.com (Jakub Jelinek) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 06:04:21 -0400 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <1159747958.1721.3.camel@averatec> References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> <1159747958.1721.3.camel@averatec> Message-ID: <20061002100421.GH20982@devserv.devel.redhat.com> On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 08:12:38PM -0400, Jon Nettleton wrote: > On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:41 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Gilboa Davara gmail.com> writes: > > > What-no-why-how-NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! > > > Is it being moved to extra? > > > > I'd guess it's certainly possible, and it's probably going to get done faster > > if you submit it. ;-) Creating an Extras package from a Core subpackage is > > actually pretty easy, take the Core specfile, disable the build of everything > > you don't need built for that subpackage, add rm commands for everything else, > > and use just the file list of the former subpackage. > > I see the use of rm commands all the time in spec files. Can anyone > explain why this is used instead of the %exclude directive? Not > important, just curious because excluding files seems like a much safer > and elegant solution. AFAIK the *debuginfo subpackages are created from the full content of the %{buildroot} tree, not only from files listed in %files. So, if you don't rm and use %exclude, the debuginfo packages might be substantially bigger than they really need to be. Jakub From sundaram at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 2 10:53:51 2006 From: sundaram at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Sundaram) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:23:51 +0530 Subject: Linux Cluster In-Reply-To: <20061002051832.HM.00000000000000T@krolyn.bos-mail-wwl8.lycos.com> References: <20061002051832.HM.00000000000000T@krolyn.bos-mail-wwl8.lycos.com> Message-ID: <4520EFBF.5060609@fedoraproject.org> Krolyn K wrote: > Hi all, > > I've recently been trying to install a Linux Cluster on several > computers with Fedora Core 5. > I've tried SLURM and it looks like it works quite well. SLURM is > Open-Source, actively maintained and widely used. > I thought that maybe it could be included in the next fedora release. > Are you willing to maintain it? Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras if you are interested in that. Rahul From rdieter at math.unl.edu Mon Oct 2 11:24:56 2006 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 06:24:56 -0500 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <1159745262.7868.40.camel@aglarond.local> References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> <1159745262.7868.40.camel@aglarond.local> Message-ID: Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 04:41 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: >> On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 06:01 -0400, buildsys at redhat.com wrote: >>> vim-2:7.0.109-3 >>> --------------- >>> * Thu Sep 28 2006 Jeremy Katz - 7.0.109-3 >>> - disable vim-spell subpackage as it pushes us over CD boundaries >> What-no-why-how-NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! >> Is it being moved to extra? > If someone wants to pick the bits up and maintain them in Extras, it > shouldn't be problematic as it's an entirely separate tarball anyway IMO, upstream packages it separately, so should we. +1 for Extras. -- Rex From buildsys at redhat.com Mon Oct 2 11:25:57 2006 From: buildsys at redhat.com (buildsys at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 07:25:57 -0400 Subject: rawhide report: 20061002 changes Message-ID: <200610021125.k92BPvI2003752@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> Updated Packages: SysVinit-2.86-13 ---------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.86-13 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 a2ps-4.13b-57 ------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 4.13b-57 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 audit-1.2.8-1.fc6 ----------------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 Steve Grubb 1.2.8-1 - Add dist tag and bump version (#208532) - Make internal auditd buffers bigger for context info - Correct address resolving of hostname in logging functions - Do not allow multiple msgtypes in same audit rule in auditctl (#207666) - Only =, != operators for arch & inode fields in auditctl (#206427) - Updated audit message type table - Remove watches from aureport since FS_WATCH is deprecated - Add audit_log_avc back temporarily (#208152) * Mon Sep 18 2006 Steve Grubb 1.2.7-2 - Fix logging messages to use addr if passed. - Apply patches from Tony Jones correcting no kernel support messages - Updated syscall tables for 2.6.18 kernel - Remove deprecated functions: audit_log, audit_log_avc, audit_log_if_enabled - Disallow syscall auditing on exclude list - Improve time handling in ausearch and aureport (#191394) - Attempt to reconstruct full path from relative for searching * Wed Aug 30 2006 Steve Grubb 1.2.6-3 - Rename audit event socket beagle-0.2.10-3.fc6 ------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.2.10-3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 cachefilesd-0.7-2.fc6 --------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.7-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 cman-2.0.18-2.fc6 ----------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.0.18-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 compiz-0.0.13-0.31.20060817git.fc6 ---------------------------------- * Sat Sep 30 2006 Soren Sandmann - 0.0.13-0.31.20060818git.fc6 - Add buildrequires on intltool * Sat Sep 30 2006 Soren Sandmann - 0.0.13-0.31.20060818git.fc6 - Build * Fri Sep 29 2006 Soren Sandmann - Update to desktop-effects-0.6.163, which has translation enabled. (Bug 208257) control-center-1:2.16.0-9.fc6 ----------------------------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 Christopher Aillon - 2.16.0-9 - Don't let default-applications tell official gecko applications to launch new tabs or windows, as it causes them to not launch when there is no running instance. cups-1:1.2.4-4 -------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1:1.2.4-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Wed Sep 27 2006 Tim Waugh 1:1.2.4-3 - Add '--help' option to lpr command (bug #206380, STR #1989). dbus-0.93-3.fc6 --------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.93-3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Tue Sep 19 2006 Matthias Clasen - 0.93-2 - Add a Requires for libxml2-python (#201877) * Thu Sep 14 2006 John (J5) Palmieri - 0.93-1 - Updated from upstream D-Bus 1.0 RC 1 (0.93) desktop-printing-0.19-16.fc6 ---------------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.19-16 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Fri Sep 29 2006 Matthias Clasen - 0.19-15 - Avoid a crash (#208239) dhcdbd-2.1-1.fc6 ---------------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 David Cantrell - 2.1-1 - Line continuation slashes for the description in dhcdbd.init (#204711) dhcpv6-0.10-32.fc6 ------------------ * Fri Sep 29 2006 David Cantrell - 0.10-32 - Line continuation slashes for init script description (#204713) dmraid-1.0.0.rc12-7.fc6 ----------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.0.0.rc12-7 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 dovecot-1.0-0.1.rc7.fc6 ----------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.0-0.1.rc7 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 eclipse-1:3.2.1-4.fc6 --------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Andrew Overholt 3.2.1-4 - Fix triggerpostun to include epoch of previous releases. * Fri Sep 29 2006 Ben Konrath 3.2.1-3 - Add Requires(post,postun) to platform and sdk sub-packages so that post and postun scripts work correctly. * Fri Sep 29 2006 Andrew Overholt 3.2.1-3 - Add triggerpostun to deal with old rebuild-sdk-features postun crap (rh#207442, rh#207013). eclipse-bugzilla-1:0.2.4-3.fc6 ------------------------------ * Fri Sep 29 2006 Ben Konrath 0.2.4-3 - Remove Requires: eclipse-platform < 3.2.1. eclipse-cdt-1:3.1.1-1.fc6 ------------------------- * Thu Sep 28 2006 Jeff Johnston 3.1.1-1 - Rebase autotools to 0.0.5 source. - Rebase CDT to 3.1.1 source. - Bugzilla 206719, 206359, 206164 eclipse-changelog-1:2.3.2-1.fc6 ------------------------------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 Kyu Lee 2.3.2-1 - Imported fix for prepare changelog feature that did not work with Eclipse 3.2.1. - Also removed un-needed remove-pydev patch. ekiga-2.0.2-7 ------------- * Sat Sep 30 2006 Matthias Clasen - 2.0.2-7 - Make the status icon work in transparent panels esc-1.0.0-16.fc6 ---------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.0.0-16 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Fri Sep 22 2006 Jack Magne - 1.0.0-15 - Fix to the build version * Fri Sep 22 2006 Jack Magne - 1.0.0-14 - Fix to compile error in daemon evince-0.6.0-3.fc6 ------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6.0-3.fc6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 evolution-2.8.0-7.fc6 --------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.8.0-7.fc6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Thu Sep 21 2006 Matthew Barnes - 2.8.0-6.fc6 - Add patch for RH bug #205576 (message deletion in thread view). * Wed Sep 20 2006 Matthew Barnes - 2.8.0-5.fc6 - Add patch for Gnome.org bug #356811 (lingering file on uninstall). evolution-connector-2.8.0-3.fc6 ------------------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.8.0-3.fc6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 fontconfig-2.4.1-3.fc6 ---------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.4.1-3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 gcalctool-5.8.24-2.fc6 ---------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Matthias Clasen - 5.8.24-2 - Fix a segfault in the or_IN locale due to careless string handling. (#208695) gcc-4.1.1-28 ------------ * Sat Sep 30 2006 Jakub Jelinek 4.1.1-28 - fix i386/x86_64 legitimize_pic_address with TLS symbols (PR target/29198) - fix gimplification of post-increment with side-effects on the inner expression (PR c/29154) gjdoc-0.7.7-10 -------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.7.7-10 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 glibc-2.5-1 ----------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 Jakub Jelinek 2.5-1 - glibc 2.5 release gnome-applets-1:2.16.0.1-7.fc6 ------------------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1:2.16.0.1-7 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 gnome-python2-extras-2.14.2-4.fc6 --------------------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.14.2-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Fri Sep 22 2006 John (J5) Palmieri - 2.14.2-3 - Remove the Requires on the parent package from gtkmozembed so we don't pull in gnome-python2 also. At some point we should look at what requires gnome-python2 and only Require it for those sub packages and not the parent package. gnome-screensaver-2.16.0-7.fc6 ------------------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.16.0-7.fc6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Thu Sep 28 2006 Ray Strode - 2.16.0-6.fc6 - don't busy loop if the smart card even message pipe isn't ready (bug 208018) gnome-user-share-0.10-5 ----------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.10-5 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 gnome-vfs2-2.16.0-4.fc6 ----------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.16.0-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 grub-0.97-13 ------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.97-13 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 gsf-sharp-0.8.1-2.fc6 --------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.8.1-2.fc6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 gtk2-2.10.4-4.fc6 ----------------- * Sat Sep 30 2006 Matthias Clasen - 2.10.4-4 - Avoid a possible segfault (gnome #358405) * Fri Sep 29 2006 Matthias Clasen - 2.10.4-3 - Fix a possible deadlock when not using the gnome-vfs filesystem backend * Sat Sep 23 2006 Matthias Clasen - 2.10.4-2 - Fix a problem with the search patch gzip-1.3.5-9 ------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.3.5-9 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.3 ----------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 icu-3.6-4 --------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 3.6-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 ifd-egate-0.05-15 ----------------- * Thu Sep 28 2006 Bob Relyea 0.05-15 - Fix slow hub issues iproute-2.6.16-6.fc6 -------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.6.16-6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 ipsec-tools-0.6.5-6 ------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6.5-6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 jakarta-commons-codec-0:1.3-7jpp.2 ---------------------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating 0:1.3-7jpp.2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 jessie-0:1.0.1-7 ---------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0:1.0.1-7 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 kbd-1.12-18 ----------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 Miloslav Trmac - 1.12-18 - Add a missing tilde to U+00E3 in latarcyrheb-sun16.psfu (#204470) kdebase-6:3.5.4-12.fc6 ---------------------- * Mon Oct 02 2006 Than Ngo Than Ngo 6:3.5.4-12 - fix #178320,#198828, follow menu-spec * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 6:3.5.4-11 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Tue Sep 26 2006 Than Ngo 6:3.5.4-10 - FedoraDNA for KDM - fix #205566, don't overwrite config files - fix #178320,#198828, follow menu-spec kudzu-1.2.57.1-2 ---------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.2.57.1-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 libX11-1.0.3-4.fc6 ------------------ * Sat Sep 30 2006 Soren Sandmann 1.0.3-4.fc6 - Fix patch so it actually applies. (#208508) * Sat Sep 30 2006 Soren Sandmann 1.0.3-4.fc6 - Fix typos in patch for indic locales (#208580) libXp-1.0.0-8 ------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.0.0-8 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 libgnome-2.16.0-4.fc6 --------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.16.0-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Tue Sep 26 2006 Matthew Barnes - 2.16.0-3.fc6 - Make the API documentation easier to navigate. * Mon Sep 11 2006 Matthias Clasen - 2.16.0-2 - Update the patch for the default background (#205867) - Add missing BuildRequires libgnomeui-2.16.0-4.fc6 ----------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.16.0-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 libgpg-error-1.4-2 ------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.4-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 libgtop2-2.14.4-2.fc6 --------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.14.4-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 libselinux-1.30.29-2 -------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.30.29-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Fri Sep 29 2006 Dan Walsh - 1.30.29-1 - Upgrade to latest from NSA * Merged av_permissions.h update from Steve Grubb, adding setsockcreate and polmatch definitions. * Wed Sep 27 2006 Jeremy Katz - 1.30.28-3 - really make -devel depend on libsepol-devel libsoup-2.2.96-4.fc6 -------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.2.96-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 libunwind-0.98.5-3 ------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.98.5-3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 libuser-0.54.7-2 ---------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.54.7-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 libwnck-2.16.0-4.fc6 -------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.16.0-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 logrotate-3.7.4-7 ----------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 3.7.4-7 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 mailman-3:2.1.9-2 ----------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 3:2.1.9-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 mc-1:4.6.1a-30.fc6 ------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating 4.6.1a-30 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Tue Sep 26 2006 Jindrich Novy 4.6.1a-29 - add experimental IPv6 support for ftpfs (#198386), thanks to Dan Kopecek for the patch * Wed Sep 13 2006 Jindrich Novy 4.6.1a-28.fc6 - update to new CVS snapshot (09-12-21) - drop .assembly, .spec patches -> applied upstream mesa-6.5.1-7.fc6 ---------------- * Sat Sep 30 2006 Soren Sandmann - 6.5.1-7.fc6 - Update to gl-manpages-1.0.1.tar.bz2 which doesn't use symlinks. (#184547) * Sat Sep 30 2006 Soren Sandmann - 6.5.1-7.fc6 - Remove . after popd; add .gz in %files section. (#184547) * Sat Sep 30 2006 Soren Sandmann - Use better tarball for gl man pages. (#184547) metacity-2.16.0-5.fc6 --------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.16.0-5 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 mod_auth_kerb-5.1-3 ------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 5.1-3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 nautilus-2.16.0-5.fc6 --------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.16.0-5 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 nc-1.84-10.fc6 -------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.84-10 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 ncompress-4.2.4-47 ------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 4.2.4-47 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 net-snmp-1:5.3.1-11.fc6 ----------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 5.3.1-11 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Mon Sep 25 2006 Radek Vokal 5.3.1-10 - add mibII/mta_sendmail (#207909) netpbm-10.35-3.fc6 ------------------ * Fri Sep 29 2006 Jindrich Novy 10.35-3 - remove OSI 1.1 from security patch (#208587) * Sun Sep 24 2006 Jindrich Novy 10.35-2 - fix ppmquantall (#207799), thanks to Steve Grubb * Mon Sep 18 2006 Jindrich Novy 10.35-1 - update to 10.35 - drop .pnmtopng, .rgbtxt patches, fixed upstream - sync .xwidfix, .ppmtompeg patches - regenerate man pages openldap-2.3.27-4 ----------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.3.27-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 orca-1.0.0-4.fc6 ---------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.0.0-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 pam_pkcs11-0.5.3-22 ------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.5.3-22 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 pango-1.14.4-3.fc6 ------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.14.4-3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 paps-0.6.6-16.fc6 ----------------- * Sat Sep 30 2006 Akira TAGOH - 0.6.6-16 - paps-0.6.6-exitcode.patch: exit immediately with proper exit code when unrecoverable error occurs. (#208592) perl-Archive-Tar-1.30-1.fc6 --------------------------- * Tue Sep 19 2006 Robin Norwood - 1.30-1 - Bump to 1.30 perl-DBD-MySQL-3.0007-1.fc6 --------------------------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 Robin Norwood - 3.0007-1 - Bugzilla: 208633 - Upgrade to upstream version 3.0007 version to fix some minor bugs. policycoreutils-1.30.30-1 ------------------------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 Dan Walsh 1.30.30-1 - Update to upstream * Merged newrole auditing of failures due to user actions from Michael Thompson. poppler-0.5.4-2.fc6 ------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.5.4-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 ppc64-utils-0.9-15 ------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.9-15 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 pykickstart-0.35-1 ------------------ * Fri Sep 29 2006 Chris Lumens - 0.35-1 - Fix traceback in harddrive command (#208557). python-2.4.3-18.fc6 ------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.4.3-18 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 pyxf86config-0.3.31-2.fc6 ------------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.3.31-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 readahead-1:1.3-5 ----------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1:1.3-5 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 redhat-lsb-3.1-11 ----------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 3.1-11 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 rhpxl-0.35-2 ------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.35-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 ruby-1.8.5-3.fc6 ---------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.8.5-3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 scim-anthy-1.2.0-3.fc6 ---------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.2.0-3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 scim-chewing-0.3.1-7.fc6 ------------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.3.1-7 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 selinux-policy-2.3.17-1 ----------------------- * Thu Sep 28 2006 Dan Walsh 2.3.17-1 - Update to upstream squashfs-tools-3.0-4 -------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 3.0-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 sudo-1.6.8p12-10 ---------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.6.8p12-10 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 tetex-3.0-32.fc6 ---------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 3.0-32 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Thu Sep 21 2006 Jindrich Novy 3.0-31 - fix para option in footmisc package (#188701) * Sat Sep 16 2006 Jindrich Novy 3.0-30 - use `install' instead of `mv' in mktexlsr, thanks to Dan Walsh tsclient-0.148-4.fc6 -------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.148-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 usermode-1.87-2 --------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.87-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 util-linux-2.13-0.43.fc6 ------------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.13-0.43 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 virt-manager-0.2.3-2.fc6 ------------------------ * Fri Sep 29 2006 Daniel P. Berrange 0.2.3-2.fc6 - Fix segv in sparkline code when no data points are defined (bz 208185) - Clamp CPU utilization between 0 & 100% just in case (bz 208185) * Tue Sep 26 2006 Daniel Berrange - 0.2.3-1.fc6 - Require xeninst >= 0.93.0 to fix block backed devices - Skip para/fully-virt step when going back in wizard if not HVM host (bz 207409) - Fix handling of modifier keys in VNC console so Alt key doesn't get stuck (bz 207949) - Allow sticky modifier keys by pressing same key 3 times in row (enables Ctrl-Alt-F1 by doing Ctrl Ctrl Ctrl Alt-F1) - Improved error handling during guest creation - Log errors with python logging, instead of to stdout - Remove unused buttons from main domain list window - Switch out of full screen & release key grab when closing console - Trim sparkline CPU history graph to 40 samples max - Constraint VCPU adjuster to only allow upto guest's max VCPU count - Show guest's max & current VCPU count in details page - Fix rounding of disk sizes to avoid a 1.9 GB disk being rounded down to 1 GB - Use raw block device path to CDROM not mount point for HVM guest (bz 206965) - Fix visibility of file size spin box (bz 206186 part 2) - Check for GTK failing to open X11 display (bz 205938) * Fri Sep 15 2006 Daniel Berrange - 0.2.2-1.fc6 - Fix event handling in create VM wizard (bz 206660 & 206186) - Fix close button in about dialog (bz 205943) - Refresh .pot files - Turn on VNC scrollbars fulltime to avoid GTK window sizing issue which consistently resize too small. wget-1.10.2-7 ------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.10.2-7 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 xen-3.0.2-42 ------------ * Fri Sep 29 2006 Daniel P. Berrange - 3.0.2-42 - Added vnclisten patches to make VNC only listen on localhost out of the box, configurable by 'vnclisten' parameter (bz 203196) * Thu Sep 28 2006 Stephen C. Tweedie - 3.0.2-41 - Update to xen-3.0.3-testing changeset 11633 * Thu Sep 28 2006 Stephen C. Tweedie - 3.0.2-40 - Workaround blktap/xenstore startup race - Add udev rules for xen blktap devices (srostedt) - Add support for dynamic blktap device nodes (srostedt) - Fixes for infinite dom0 cpu usage with blktap - Fix xm not to die on malformed "tap:" blkif config string - Enable blktap on kernels without epoll-for-aio support. - Load the blktap module automatically at startup - Reenable blktapctrl xinetd-2:2.3.14-8 ----------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2:2.3.14-8 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.6.2-3.fc6 ---------------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 6.6.2-3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 xorg-x11-drv-i810-1.6.5-9.fc6 ----------------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.6.5-9 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 xorg-x11-drv-sis-0.9.1-7 ------------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.9.1-7 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Wed Sep 20 2006 Adam Jackson 0.9.1-6 - sis-0.9.1-assert.patch: Include assert.h so we don't crash. * Thu Aug 17 2006 Bill Nottingham 0.9.1-5 - fix sis.xinf for XGI (case sensitive) xorg-x11-drv-vesa-1.2.1-4 ------------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.2.1-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 xorg-x11-proto-devel-7.1-9.fc6 ------------------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 7.1-9 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 xorg-x11-xinit-1.0.2-12.fc6 --------------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.0.2-12 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 Broken deps for s390 ---------------------------------------------------------- systemtap - 0.5.9-1.fc6.s390 requires kernel >= 0:2.6.9-11 From fedora at camperquake.de Mon Oct 2 11:34:58 2006 From: fedora at camperquake.de (Ralf Ertzinger) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:34:58 +0200 Subject: rawhide report: 20061002 changes In-Reply-To: <200610021125.k92BPvI2003752@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> References: <200610021125.k92BPvI2003752@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> Message-ID: <4520F962.9010104@camperquake.de> Hi. > - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 Is this something I should be worried about? From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Mon Oct 2 11:40:27 2006 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:40:27 +0200 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <9310.192.54.193.51.1159777991.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> References: <200609291001.k8TA1pa7010932@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <1159670467.18420.0.camel@gilboa-home-dev.localhost> <1159747958.1721.3.camel@averatec> <20061002095056.6a833466.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <9310.192.54.193.51.1159777991.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <20061002134027.0d5e7063.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:33:11 +0200 (CEST), Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le Lun 2 octobre 2006 09:50, Michael Schwendt a ?crit : > > > rpmbuild fails if in the build root no filenames match the %exclude > > pattern, which can happen when using a single spec file for multiple > > targets. Hence "rm -f" is safer, because it works fine also with > > non-existant files. > > replace "safer" with "less work for the lazy packager" there > > If you expect to remove some files but they're not present *something* > changed upstream. Blindly continuing without any packager review certainly > isn't the "safe" choice. Or something changed in the development tool-chain. Well, I disagree anyway, since semantically it might be "if the file is there, remove it as I do not want it, ever, as it would break my package". The removal is intentional. The removed file might break the build or create file-based conflicts or introduce precompiled binaries (depending on the build host arch) and bad deps -- whatever. You don't want extra burden for packagers, that they need to check with every [perhaps tiny] update whether any "rm -f" commands are still needed for every target platform. As with "rm -f %{_infodir}/dir" or things like that. From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org Mon Oct 2 12:19:17 2006 From: jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org (Josh Boyer) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:19:17 -0500 Subject: rawhide report: 20061002 changes In-Reply-To: <4520F962.9010104@camperquake.de> References: <200610021125.k92BPvI2003752@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> <4520F962.9010104@camperquake.de> Message-ID: <1159791557.6504.12.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 13:34 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > > - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 > > Is this something I should be worried about? If you often debug with GDB, or do low level things in your app (like call backtrace), yes. Stay tuned. josh From sundaram at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 2 13:10:01 2006 From: sundaram at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Sundaram) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 18:40:01 +0530 Subject: Compiz not installed by default? Message-ID: <45210FA9.6050601@fedoraproject.org> Hi Wouldnt it be better to install Compiz by default in FC6? Installing it offers a nice menu option to enable desktop effects and I wouldnt want this to be obscure.Apparently this is not being done now though I was under the impression it had been. Rahul From tjb at unh.edu Mon Oct 2 13:45:27 2006 From: tjb at unh.edu (Thomas J. Baker) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:45:27 -0400 Subject: cpu scaling questions Message-ID: <1159796727.4113.6.camel@raptor.sr.unh.edu> I've got two questions related to cpu scaling. On my laptop I've got a Core 2 Duo. Can the two cores scale frequencies independently? Most of the time that doesn't seem like the case but every once in a while, my cpufreq applets show different speeds. I'm assuming that there is just a bit of slop involved and the two cores are always the same speed. On my desktop, I've got Xeon CPUs that support limited scaling; they run at either 2.8 or 3.4GHz. On FC5, they used to scale on demand but under FC6 they don't and the cpufreq applet has a manual setting for 2.8 or 3.4 with an automatic setting that is greyed out. Thanks, tjb -- ======================================================================= | Thomas Baker email: tjb at unh.edu | | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | ======================================================================= From giallu at gmail.com Mon Oct 2 14:03:10 2006 From: giallu at gmail.com (Gianluca Sforna) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:03:10 +0200 Subject: Compiz not installed by default? In-Reply-To: <45210FA9.6050601@fedoraproject.org> References: <45210FA9.6050601@fedoraproject.org> Message-ID: On 10/2/06, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Wouldnt it be better to install Compiz by default in FC6? Installing it > offers a nice menu option to enable desktop effects and I wouldnt want > this to be obscure.Apparently this is not being done now though I was > under the impression it had been. What??? I am eagerly waiting for FC6 just for all the *bling* it is supposed to bring... please count this as a +1 to the install by default to compiz Cheers Gianluca From d.jacobfeuerborn at conversis.de Mon Oct 2 14:19:52 2006 From: d.jacobfeuerborn at conversis.de (Dennis Jacobfeuerborn) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:19:52 +0200 Subject: Compiz not installed by default? In-Reply-To: <45210FA9.6050601@fedoraproject.org> References: <45210FA9.6050601@fedoraproject.org> Message-ID: <45212008.8070508@conversis.de> Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > Wouldnt it be better to install Compiz by default in FC6? Installing it > offers a nice menu option to enable desktop effects and I wouldnt want > this to be obscure.Apparently this is not being done now though I was > under the impression it had been. I don't think pushing compiz too hard is a good idea at this point. Setting it up properly under various configurations still requires quite a bit of black magic. After all it's just a "yum install compiz" away for those who really want to wrestle with these issues. Regards, Dennis From denis at poolshark.org Mon Oct 2 14:23:41 2006 From: denis at poolshark.org (Denis Leroy) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:23:41 +0200 Subject: Compiz not installed by default? In-Reply-To: References: <45210FA9.6050601@fedoraproject.org> Message-ID: <452120ED.3030209@poolshark.org> Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On 10/2/06, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> Wouldnt it be better to install Compiz by default in FC6? Installing it >> offers a nice menu option to enable desktop effects and I wouldnt want >> this to be obscure.Apparently this is not being done now though I was >> under the impression it had been. > > What??? > I am eagerly waiting for FC6 just for all the *bling* it is supposed > to bring... > > please count this as a +1 to the install by default to compiz > -1 for me, still too many issues. - is missing many keyboard shortcuts to navigate desktops or manipulate windows (no 'raise window' shortcut :-( ). - some apps don't work with it. Thunderbird for example, which is a show-stopper to me - only supports linear left/right desktop move ? The "number of rows" from the Desktop Effects menu seems to create desktops I can't access... From katzj at redhat.com Mon Oct 2 14:25:27 2006 From: katzj at redhat.com (Jeremy Katz) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:25:27 -0400 Subject: rawhide report: 20060929 changes In-Reply-To: <200610020253.k922rMYh006443@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> References: <200610020253.k922rMYh006443@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> Message-ID: <1159799127.12629.2.camel@orodruin.boston.redhat.com> On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 22:53 -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Sunday 01 October 2006 20:12, Jon Nettleton wrote: > > > I see the use of rm commands all the time in spec files. Can anyone > > > explain why this is used instead of the %exclude directive? Not > > > important, just curious because excluding files seems like a much safer > > > and elegant solution. > > > Lack of education? Maybe the developer isn't aware of the %exclude, or > > would rather just remove the files anyway. I use rm to remove static > > libraries rather than exclude them. > > What is sorely needed is a RPM reference... the "Maximum RPM" book is nice > as narrative, but almost useless at the time of designing a new .spec file There's the Red Hat RPM Guide -- I'm not sure if it's actually _better_ in this respect (... I've been doing packages for too long to be a good judgge :-), but it's at least more current. Online at http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/drafts/rpm-guide-en/ or purchasable in printed form as well Jeremy From n0dalus+redhat at gmail.com Mon Oct 2 14:28:53 2006 From: n0dalus+redhat at gmail.com (n0dalus) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 23:58:53 +0930 Subject: Compiz not installed by default? In-Reply-To: <452120ED.3030209@poolshark.org> References: <45210FA9.6050601@fedoraproject.org> <452120ED.3030209@poolshark.org> Message-ID: <6280325c0610020728k52726508y4b158ea83427bd56@mail.gmail.com> On 10/2/06, Denis Leroy wrote: > Gianluca Sforna wrote: > > On 10/2/06, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Wouldnt it be better to install Compiz by default in FC6? Installing it > >> offers a nice menu option to enable desktop effects and I wouldnt want > >> this to be obscure.Apparently this is not being done now though I was > >> under the impression it had been. > > > > What??? > > I am eagerly waiting for FC6 just for all the *bling* it is supposed > > to bring... > > > > please count this as a +1 to the install by default to compiz > > > > -1 for me, still too many issues. > I don't think it should be enabled by default, but having it installed by default means it is only a checkbox away for people wanting to check it out. +1 for me. n0dalus. From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Mon Oct 2 14:32:45 2006 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:32:45 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Compiz not installed by default? In-Reply-To: <452120ED.3030209@poolshark.org> References: <45210FA9.6050601@fedoraproject.org> <452120ED.3030209@poolshark.org> Message-ID: <45095.192.54.193.51.1159799565.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> Le Lun 2 octobre 2006 16:23, Denis Leroy a ?crit : > Gianluca Sforna wrote: >> please count this as a +1 to the install by default to compiz >> > > -1 for me, still too many issues. Does it work with nVidia users with the FLOSS nv driver ? -- Nicolas Mailhot From sundaram at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 2 14:39:36 2006 From: sundaram at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Sundaram) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:09:36 +0530 Subject: Compiz not installed by default? In-Reply-To: <45095.192.54.193.51.1159799565.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> References: <45210FA9.6050601@fedoraproject.org> <452120ED.3030209@poolshark.org> <45095.192.54.193.51.1159799565.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <452124A8.209@fedoraproject.org> Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le Lun 2 octobre 2006 16:23, Denis Leroy a ?crit : >> Gianluca Sforna wrote: > >>> please count this as a +1 to the install by default to compiz >>> >> -1 for me, still too many issues. > > Does it work with nVidia users with the FLOSS nv driver ? > No. It would just fall back to using Metacity. Just to clarify, I am asking for compiz to be considered for installation by default so that its not easily enabled for those with the hardware that is supported by the stock Xorg drivers. There are known issues with this configuration so it shouldnt be enabled by default. Rahul Rahul From denis at poolshark.org Mon Oct 2 14:44:29 2006 From: denis at poolshark.org (Denis Leroy) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:44:29 +0200 Subject: Compiz not installed by default? In-Reply-To: <6280325c0610020728k52726508y4b158ea83427bd56@mail.gmail.com> References: <45210FA9.6050601@fedoraproject.org> <452120ED.3030209@poolshark.org> <6280325c0610020728k52726508y4b158ea83427bd56@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <452125CD.2000204@poolshark.org> n0dalus wrote: > On 10/2/06, Denis Leroy wrote: >> Gianluca Sforna wrote: >> > On 10/2/06, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> >> Wouldnt it be better to install Compiz by default in FC6? >> Installing it >> >> offers a nice menu option to enable desktop effects and I wouldnt want >> >> this to be obscure.Apparently this is not being done now though I was >> >> under the impression it had been. >> > >> > What??? >> > I am eagerly waiting for FC6 just for all the *bling* it is supposed >> > to bring... >> > >> > please count this as a +1 to the install by default to compiz >> > >> >> -1 for me, still too many issues. >> > > I don't think it should be enabled by default, but having it installed > by default means it is only a checkbox away for people wanting to > check it out. > > +1 for me. yes that's a good point. Installed by default, but not enabled by default. I like that too. From krh at redhat.com Mon Oct 2 14:45:17 2006 From: krh at redhat.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kristian_H=F8gsberg?=) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:45:17 -0400 Subject: Compiz not installed by default? In-Reply-To: <45212008.8070508@conversis.de> References: <45210FA9.6050601@fedoraproject.org> <45212008.8070508@conversis.de> Message-ID: <452125FD.1070204@redhat.com> Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> Hi >> >> Wouldnt it be better to install Compiz by default in FC6? Installing >> it offers a nice menu option to enable desktop effects and I wouldnt >> want this to be obscure.Apparently this is not being done now though I >> was under the impression it had been. > > I don't think pushing compiz too hard is a good idea at this point. > Setting it up properly under various configurations still requires quite > a bit of black magic. After all it's just a "yum install compiz" away > for those who really want to wrestle with these issues. We've been working quite a bit on integrating compiz, so that there should be no 'black magic' involved. If compiz works on your hardware with the drivers that we ship, it should be just a matter of enabling it. If you require further workarounds to get it to work with the open source drivers, please let us know so we can incorporate these in the default setup. thanks, Kristian From jkeating at redhat.com Mon Oct 2 14:56:39 2006 From: jkeating at redhat.com (Jesse Keating) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:56:39 -0400 Subject: rawhide report: 20061002 changes In-Reply-To: <200610021125.k92BPvI2003752@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> References: <200610021125.k92BPvI2003752@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200610021056.39244.jkeating@redhat.com> On Monday 02 October 2006 07:25, buildsys at redhat.com wrote: > Updated Packages: This tree blew up during the build wrt the bootable images and such. I'm spinning a new rawhide now, should be out in a few hours. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From caillon at redhat.com Mon Oct 2 15:04:20 2006 From: caillon at redhat.com (Christopher Aillon) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:04:20 -0400 Subject: Firefox trademark shenanigans (Re: Any chance of getting Firefox 2.0 into rawhide/FC6?) In-Reply-To: References: <16de708d0609302024h5f7e18c5y8fd2e25e4c366923@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45212A74.706@redhat.com> Kevin Kofler wrote: > Arthur Pemberton gmail.com> writes: >> Sorry to jump in here. But from what I've read, it seems that MozCo is >> cool with Fedora as things stand. > > But for how long? I think the patch approval process can also be a constraint > on the Fedora Legacy team. Currently, Legacy is simply upgrading rather than > backporting, and even working on packaging Seamonkey to replace the > discontinued Mozilla Suite for the older distros (that gratuitous name change > is also due to Mozilla's trademark policies, by the way), No, it's not. Seamonkey's name is rather irrelevant. It's really a different product. Not maintained by the same people, it's a fork of the old project. See what happened with galeon and epiphany. Same browser, same original author, different name. Firefox's stringent trademarking policies became born because the Mozilla trademark became diluted. You even see it in Internet Explorer's User Agent string. The Mozilla trademark was long since "lost" so to speak. but what if they want > to work together with the Debian stable people on backporting fixes instead? I > don't think being shackled by a restrictive trademark agreement is what Free > Software is about. The question people are asking seems to be directed on what if Mozilla doesn't agree with us? But the real question everyone *should* be asking is what if *we* don't agree with *them*? Because until that time, we have no reason to worry about this. With the rate of how quickly security fixes are turned around and the complexity of them, you'd need a team of many people to get patches out in a timely manner for all past releases, and produce quality patches. I'm really not sure how Debian is going to handle the one large mega security patch that took Brendan and jst (Chief Architect and Senior Architect) two+ months to patch plus over 10 regressions. I see no good reason to *want* to not take new releases wholesale at this time. As long as we're selective about the releases we take. (E.g. take 1.5.0.x NOT the RC for now simply for maintenance purposes). > > Also, do you like how Mozilla is using this as an argument to pressure Debian > into compliance? "See, Fedora does what we want, why don't you?" I think this > places Fedora entirely on the wrong side of the fence. Fedora does what Fedora wants. I've pushed for new releases because I can't possibly keep up with the security backporting. See above. The fact that I want to meet their needs at this time is a coincidence. Yay, you get sexy branding. Enjoy. From caillon at redhat.com Mon Oct 2 15:07:04 2006 From: caillon at redhat.com (Christopher Aillon) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:07:04 -0400 Subject: GNOME 2.16.1 in FC6? In-Reply-To: <451EE3C5.7060804@glezos.com> References: <451EE3C5.7060804@glezos.com> Message-ID: <45212B18.9060908@redhat.com> Dimitris Glezos wrote: > GNOME 2.16.1 is released on 4/10 (tarballs due 2/10) and FC6 freeze is on 2/10. > > * http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointFifteen > * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Core/Schedule > > Are we planning on including Gnome 2.16.1 in FC6? > > The Desktop beat and release notes say it's 2.16. Just want to make sure. If they don't make it into the final release, there's always FC6 updates. From pemboa at gmail.com Mon Oct 2 15:07:31 2006 From: pemboa at gmail.com (Arthur Pemberton) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:07:31 -0500 Subject: Firefox trademark shenanigans (Re: Any chance of getting Firefox 2.0 into rawhide/FC6?) In-Reply-To: <45212A74.706@redhat.com> References: <16de708d0609302024h5f7e18c5y8fd2e25e4c366923@mail.gmail.com> <45212A74.706@redhat.com> Message-ID: <16de708d0610020807u61b7d9ebif0a1b6cee6dc898a@mail.gmail.com> On 10/2/06, Christopher Aillon wrote: > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Arthur Pemberton gmail.com> writes: > >> Sorry to jump in here. But from what I've read, it seems that MozCo is > >> cool with Fedora as things stand. > > > > But for how long? I think the patch approval process can also be a constraint > > on the Fedora Legacy team. Currently, Legacy is simply upgrading rather than > > backporting, and even working on packaging Seamonkey to replace the > > discontinued Mozilla Suite for the older distros (that gratuitous name change > > is also due to Mozilla's trademark policies, by the way), > > No, it's not. Seamonkey's name is rather irrelevant. It's really a > different product. Not maintained by the same people, it's a fork of > the old project. See what happened with galeon and epiphany. Same > browser, same original author, different name. > > Firefox's stringent trademarking policies became born because the > Mozilla trademark became diluted. You even see it in Internet > Explorer's User Agent string. The Mozilla trademark was long since > "lost" so to speak. > I always wondered how this was even allowed. -- Fedora Core 5 and proud From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Mon Oct 2 15:19:22 2006 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:19:22 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Firefox trademark shenanigans (Re: Any chance of getting Firefox 2.0 into rawhide/FC6?) In-Reply-To: <16de708d0610020807u61b7d9ebif0a1b6cee6dc898a@mail.gmail.com> References: <16de708d0609302024h5f7e18c5y8fd2e25e4c366923@mail.gmail.com> <45212A74.706@redhat.com> <16de708d0610020807u61b7d9ebif0a1b6cee6dc898a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <19981.192.54.193.51.1159802362.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> Le Lun 2 octobre 2006 17:07, Arthur Pemberton a ?crit : > On 10/2/06, Christopher Aillon wrote: >> Firefox's stringent trademarking policies became born because the >> Mozilla trademark became diluted. You even see it in Internet >> Explorer's User Agent string. The Mozilla trademark was long since >> "lost" so to speak. > I always wondered how this was even allowed. Probably because Netscape/AOL only cared about the Netscape brand -- Nicolas Mailhot From avi at argo.co.il Mon Oct 2 15:21:16 2006 From: avi at argo.co.il (Avi Kivity) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:21:16 +0200 Subject: Compiz not installed by default? In-Reply-To: <452125FD.1070204@redhat.com> References: <452125FD.1070204@redhat.com> Message-ID: <45212E6C.60906@argo.co.il> Kristian H?gsberg wrote: > > We've been working quite a bit on integrating compiz, so that there > should be > no 'black magic' involved. If compiz works on your hardware with the > drivers > that we ship, it should be just a matter of enabling it. If you require > further workarounds to get it to work with the open source drivers, > please let > us know so we can incorporate these in the default setup. > On my machine (i965) I get white windows on a black background, e.g. I can drag some white rectangle and get the wobbly window effect, but all windows are solid (if wobbly) opaque rectangles. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. From sundaram at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 2 15:38:06 2006 From: sundaram at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Sundaram) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:08:06 +0530 Subject: Firefox trademark shenanigans (Re: Any chance of getting Firefox 2.0 into rawhide/FC6?) In-Reply-To: <16de708d0610020807u61b7d9ebif0a1b6cee6dc898a@mail.gmail.com> References: <16de708d0609302024h5f7e18c5y8fd2e25e4c366923@mail.gmail.com> <45212A74.706@redhat.com> <16de708d0610020807u61b7d9ebif0a1b6cee6dc898a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4521325E.6030504@fedoraproject.org> Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On 10/2/06, Christopher Aillon wrote: >> Kevin Kofler wrote: >> > Arthur Pemberton gmail.com> writes: >> >> Sorry to jump in here. But from what I've read, it seems that MozCo is >> >> cool with Fedora as things stand. >> > >> > But for how long? I think the patch approval process can also be a >> constraint >> > on the Fedora Legacy team. Currently, Legacy is simply upgrading >> rather than >> > backporting, and even working on packaging Seamonkey to replace the >> > discontinued Mozilla Suite for the older distros (that gratuitous >> name change >> > is also due to Mozilla's trademark policies, by the way), >> >> No, it's not. Seamonkey's name is rather irrelevant. It's really a >> different product. Not maintained by the same people, it's a fork of >> the old project. See what happened with galeon and epiphany. Same >> browser, same original author, different name. >> >> Firefox's stringent trademarking policies became born because the >> Mozilla trademark became diluted. You even see it in Internet >> Explorer's User Agent string. The Mozilla trademark was long since >> "lost" so to speak. >> > > I always wondered how this was even allowed. > Mozilla was the internal codename for the Netscape product sort of like rawhide. Seamonkey was earlier code name for the suite and now trademarked independently by the developers as SeaMonkey. Rahul Rahul From sundaram at fedoraproject.org Mon Oct 2 15:38:29 2006 From: sundaram at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Sundaram) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:08:29 +0530 Subject: Firefox trademark shenanigans (Re: Any chance of getting Firefox 2.0 into rawhide/FC6?) In-Reply-To: <16de708d0610020807u61b7d9ebif0a1b6cee6dc898a@mail.gmail.com> References: <16de708d0609302024h5f7e18c5y8fd2e25e4c366923@mail.gmail.com> <45212A74.706@redhat.com> <16de708d0610020807u61b7d9ebif0a1b6cee6dc898a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45213275.2050901@fedoraproject.org> Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On 10/2/06, Christopher Aillon wrote: >> Kevin Kofler wrote: >> > Arthur Pemberton gmail.com> writes: >> >> Sorry to jump in here. But from what I've read, it seems that MozCo is >> >> cool with Fedora as things stand. >> > >> > But for how long? I think the patch approval process can also be a >> constraint >> > on the Fedora Legacy team. Currently, Legacy is simply upgrading >> rather than >> > backporting, and even working on packaging Seamonkey to replace the >> > discontinued Mozilla Suite for the older distros (that gratuitous >> name change >> > is also due to Mozilla's trademark policies, by the way), >> >> No, it's not. Seamonkey's name is rather irrelevant. It's really a >> different product. Not maintained by the same people, it's a fork of >> the old project. See what happened with galeon and epiphany. Same >> browser, same original author, different name. >> >> Firefox's stringent trademarking policies became born because the >> Mozilla trademark became diluted. You even see it in Internet >> Explorer's User Agent string. The Mozilla trademark was long since >> "lost" so to speak. >> > > I always wondered how this was even allowed. > Mozilla was the internal codename for the Netscape product sort of like rawhide. Seamonkey was earlier code name for the suite and now trademarked independently by the developers as SeaMonkey. Rahul From davej at redhat.com Mon Oct 2 16:01:15 2006 From: davej at redhat.com (Dave Jones) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:01:15 -0400 Subject: cpu scaling questions In-Reply-To: <1159796727.4113.6.camel@raptor.sr.unh.edu> References: <1159796727.4113.6.camel@raptor.sr.unh.edu> Message-ID: <20061002160115.GC23268@redhat.com> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:45:27AM -0400, Thomas J. Baker wrote: > > I've got two questions related to cpu scaling. On my laptop I've got a > Core 2 Duo. Can the two cores scale frequencies independently? No. Think about it. You have a single package, with a single power source. > Most of > the time that doesn't seem like the case but every once in a while, my > cpufreq applets show different speeds. I'm assuming that there is just a > bit of slop involved and the two cores are always the same speed. It's a bug, but it should be cosmetic only. It's on the TODO, but there are a number of other issues in this code that need tackling first before it gets clean enough to fix this properly. FC6-update/FC7 stuff. > On my desktop, I've got Xeon CPUs that support limited scaling; they run > at either 2.8 or 3.4GHz. On FC5, they used to scale on demand but under > FC6 they don't and the cpufreq applet has a manual setting for 2.8 or > 3.4 with an automatic setting that is greyed out. Which cpufreq driver were they using ? File a kernel bug, and attach dmesg. Dave From kevin-redhat-devel at scrye.com Mon Oct 2 16:22:46 2006 From: kevin-redhat-devel at scrye.com (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:22:46 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Xfce 4.4 call for testing Message-ID: <20061002.102246.347965697.kevin@scrye.com> Myself and Christoph (The xfce plugins maintainer for extras) have been building and testing Xfce4.4rc1 since it's release (and the betas before it). Things are looking all good with our limited testing now. I think we have addressed everything such as: - Some plugins are no longer available in 4.4 as their functionality has been pulled into core Xfce packages, so we have added the required Obsoletes/Provides to allow smooth upgrades with those installed. - Some packages have changed name (xfcalendar is now orage, etc), and they should be handled correctly. - Lots of cleanups of the packages. So, We would like to invite folks to do some more testing on the packages. If you have never used Xfce, you might take this as a fine chance to take a look at it. It's a lovely quick desktop env. In particular I would like to hear from people who already have the 4.3.2 packages installed and upgrade to the 4.4 packages. I'm not sure if we are going to try and push things in this week before fc6 is released, or wait until after fc6 and push them into devel and then push them into fc6 later. Thoughts on that would be welcome. For your /etc/yum.repos.d/xfce44.repo file: --cut-- [xfce44beta] name=Xfce 4.4 rc1 baseurl=http://www.scrye.com/xfce-4.4rc1/development/RPMS enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 --cut-- Thanks for any feedback and testing you can provide! kevin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From davej at redhat.com Mon Oct 2 16:32:36 2006 From: davej at redhat.com (Dave Jones) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:32:36 -0400 Subject: cpu scaling questions In-Reply-To: References: <20061002160115.GC23268@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20061002163236.GH23268@redhat.com> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:16:37PM -0400, Fulko.Hew at sita.aero wrote: > > > fedora-test-list-bounces at redhat.com wrote on 10/02/2006 12:01:15 PM: > > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:45:27AM -0400, Thomas J. Baker wrote: > > > > > > I've got two questions related to cpu scaling. On my laptop I've got a > > > Core 2 Duo. Can the two cores scale frequencies independently? > > > > No. Think about it. You have a single package, with a single power > source. > > Regardless... I just ran KSysGuard, and had it plot the CPU frequency > for both halfs of my Core 2 Duo, and then ran 'find /' in one window. > > What you see is that the clock on one CPU went up, and the other did not. > > So based on that, I'd say yes... they can scale independently. You snipped the part of my reply which explained.. So I'll add it back.. > > It's a bug Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk From bikehead at amberpoint.com Mon Oct 2 16:36:59 2006 From: bikehead at amberpoint.com (bikehead) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:36:59 -0700 Subject: help with building SRPMS... Message-ID: <4521402B.1000502@amberpoint.com> I need to rebuild NetworkManager from sources because I suspect that the madwifi special wifi patch is being applied even though it shouldn't. I do this all the time for FC5, but I seem to be having problems with doing this in FC6 and I'm hoping I can get some help with this to speed me on my way: 1) I noticed that /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-development.repo has a "development-source" entry that is disabled by default. First of all the mirror list entry fails and I have to edit it to use the baseurl entry. However, how do I get it to install the SRPM? It just claims that NetworkManager is already installed. I can get around this by just downloading the SRPM using wget, but I was wondering if there is some yum voodoo I'm missing go get yum to do it for me (and maybe even try and resolve the build dependencies). 2) I have %_topdir set to a non-root build directory and I rpm -hiv the SRPM. When I do rpmbuild -bb SPEC/NetworkManager.spec, it immediately fails because of a line like '%if %{fc6_or_later}'". When I changed it to '%if "%{fc6_or_later}"' it at least doesn't blow with a syntax error. However,.... 3) [disregard this complaint, just as I finished typing it, these packages appeared] It fails with missing dependencies like "wireless-tools-devel", "gettext-devel", "libnl-devel", "libnotify-devel", and "perl-XML-Parser". However, I can't find these in development or extras-development. Obviously, NetworkManager is being build by someone since it appears in the repo, but I can't figure out what I'm missing to make this work. thanks for any pointers -- __o Brian "la lumaca" _`\<,_ (*)/ (*) From rob at choralone.org Mon Oct 2 16:56:46 2006 From: rob at choralone.org (Rob Andrews) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:56:46 +0100 Subject: help with building SRPMS... In-Reply-To: <4521402B.1000502@amberpoint.com> References: <4521402B.1000502@amberpoint.com> Message-ID: <20061002165646.GA9846@aphasia.badger.choralone.org> On 02-Oct-2006 17:36.59 (BST), bikehead wrote: > 1) I noticed that /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-development.repo has a > "development-source" entry that is disabled by default. First of all > the mirror list entry fails and I have to edit it to use the baseurl > entry. However, how do I get it to install the SRPM? It just claims > that NetworkManager is already installed. If you don't want to pull it by hand, use 'yumdownloader' from the yum-utils package. Then run: yumdownloader --source -- rob andrews :: pgp 0x01e00563 :: rob at choralone.org From hughsient at gmail.com Mon Oct 2 19:02:25 2006 From: hughsient at gmail.com (Richard Hughes) Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:02:25 +0100 Subject: cpu scaling questions In-Reply-To: <20061002160115.GC23268@redhat.com> References: <1159796727.4113.6.camel@raptor.sr.unh.edu> <20061002160115.GC23268@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1159815745.3408.6.camel@hughsie-laptop.localdomain> On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 12:01 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > It's a bug, but it should be cosmetic only. It's on the TODO, but > there are a number of other issues in this code that need tackling > first before it gets clean enough to fix this properly. > FC6-update/FC7 stuff. IIRC, SMP cores are scaled together (like Dave said). On a related note, gnome-power-manager 2.17.1 can control the CPU scaling (and change policy based on AC and battery, idle or performance etc), although this is obviously going to have to wait until FC7. For those more impatient; There is a FC6 rpm in my repo (with the newest HAL) if you want to give it a try. If it breaks your DUO, you get to keep both cores. :-) Richard. From pemboa at gmail.com Mon Oct 2 18:48:02 2006 From: pemboa at gmail.com (Arthur Pemberton) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:48:02 -0500 Subject: Xfce 4.4 call for testing In-Reply-To: <20061002.102246.347965697.kevin@scrye.com> References: <20061002.102246.347965697.kevin@scrye.com> Message-ID: <16de708d0610021148l10300a72ia076ac5ad8912ec5@mail.gmail.com> On 10/2/06, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Myself and Christoph (The xfce plugins maintainer for extras) have been > building and testing Xfce4.4rc1 since it's release (and the betas before it). > > Things are looking all good with our limited testing now. > > I think we have addressed everything such as: > > - Some plugins are no longer available in 4.4 as their functionality > has been pulled into core Xfce packages, so we have added the required > Obsoletes/Provides to allow smooth upgrades with those installed. > > - Some packages have changed name (xfcalendar is now orage, etc), and > they should be handled correctly. > > - Lots of cleanups of the packages. > > So, We would like to invite folks to do some more testing on the > packages. If you have never used Xfce, you might take this as a fine > chance to take a look at it. It's a lovely quick desktop env. > > In particular I would like to hear from people who already have > the 4.3.2 packages installed and upgrade to the 4.4 packages. > > I'm not sure if we are going to try and push things in this week before > fc6 is released, or wait until after fc6 and push them into devel > and then push them into fc6 later. Thoughts on that would be welcome. > > For your /etc/yum.repos.d/xfce44.repo file: > --cut-- > [xfce44beta] > name=Xfce 4.4 rc1 > baseurl=http://www.scrye.com/xfce-4.4rc1/development/RPMS > enabled=1 > gpgcheck=0 > --cut-- > > Thanks for any feedback and testing you can provide! > > kevin > > Setting up yum now. Last time I used XFCE was in FC2/FC3 on a server I setup. Will give it a try. Anything I should look out for specifically? Arthur -- Fedora Core 5 and proud From buildsys at redhat.com Mon Oct 2 18:50:44 2006 From: buildsys at redhat.com (buildsys at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:50:44 -0400 Subject: rawhide report: 20061002 changes Message-ID: <200610021850.k92IoieE009307@hs20-bc2-6.build.redhat.com> Updated Packages: SysVinit-2.86-13 ---------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.86-13 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 a2ps-4.13b-57 ------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 4.13b-57 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 alsa-utils-1.0.12-3.fc6 ----------------------- * Mon Oct 02 2006 Martin Stransky 1.0.12-3 - fix for #207384 - Audio test fails during firstboot audit-1.2.8-1.fc6 ----------------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 Steve Grubb 1.2.8-1 - Add dist tag and bump version (#208532) - Make internal auditd buffers bigger for context info - Correct address resolving of hostname in logging functions - Do not allow multiple msgtypes in same audit rule in auditctl (#207666) - Only =, != operators for arch & inode fields in auditctl (#206427) - Updated audit message type table - Remove watches from aureport since FS_WATCH is deprecated - Add audit_log_avc back temporarily (#208152) * Mon Sep 18 2006 Steve Grubb 1.2.7-2 - Fix logging messages to use addr if passed. - Apply patches from Tony Jones correcting no kernel support messages - Updated syscall tables for 2.6.18 kernel - Remove deprecated functions: audit_log, audit_log_avc, audit_log_if_enabled - Disallow syscall auditing on exclude list - Improve time handling in ausearch and aureport (#191394) - Attempt to reconstruct full path from relative for searching * Wed Aug 30 2006 Steve Grubb 1.2.6-3 - Rename audit event socket authconfig-5.3.9-1 ------------------ * Mon Oct 02 2006 Tomas Mraz - 5.3.9-1 - updated translations (#207095) - correctly write pam_smb.conf with only one server specified (#208365) beagle-0.2.10-3.fc6 ------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.2.10-3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 cachefilesd-0.7-2.fc6 --------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.7-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 cman-2.0.18-2.fc6 ----------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.0.18-2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 compiz-0.0.13-0.31.20060817git.fc6 ---------------------------------- * Sat Sep 30 2006 Soren Sandmann - 0.0.13-0.31.20060818git.fc6 - Add buildrequires on intltool * Sat Sep 30 2006 Soren Sandmann - 0.0.13-0.31.20060818git.fc6 - Build * Fri Sep 29 2006 Soren Sandmann - Update to desktop-effects-0.6.163, which has translation enabled. (Bug 208257) control-center-1:2.16.0-9.fc6 ----------------------------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 Christopher Aillon - 2.16.0-9 - Don't let default-applications tell official gecko applications to launch new tabs or windows, as it causes them to not launch when there is no running instance. cups-1:1.2.4-4 -------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1:1.2.4-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Wed Sep 27 2006 Tim Waugh 1:1.2.4-3 - Add '--help' option to lpr command (bug #206380, STR #1989). cyrus-sasl-2.1.22-4 ------------------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 Nalin Dahyabhai 2.1.22-4 - rebuild without 'dlcompat' bits (#206119) dbus-0.93-3.fc6 --------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.93-3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Tue Sep 19 2006 Matthias Clasen - 0.93-2 - Add a Requires for libxml2-python (#201877) * Thu Sep 14 2006 John (J5) Palmieri - 0.93-1 - Updated from upstream D-Bus 1.0 RC 1 (0.93) desktop-printing-0.19-16.fc6 ---------------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.19-16 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Fri Sep 29 2006 Matthias Clasen - 0.19-15 - Avoid a crash (#208239) dhcdbd-2.1-1.fc6 ---------------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 David Cantrell - 2.1-1 - Line continuation slashes for the description in dhcdbd.init (#204711) dhcpv6-0.10-32.fc6 ------------------ * Fri Sep 29 2006 David Cantrell - 0.10-32 - Line continuation slashes for init script description (#204713) dmraid-1.0.0.rc12-7.fc6 ----------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.0.0.rc12-7 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 dovecot-1.0-0.1.rc7.fc6 ----------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.0-0.1.rc7 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 eclipse-1:3.2.1-4.fc6 --------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Andrew Overholt 3.2.1-4 - Fix triggerpostun to include epoch of previous releases. * Fri Sep 29 2006 Ben Konrath 3.2.1-3 - Add Requires(post,postun) to platform and sdk sub-packages so that post and postun scripts work correctly. * Fri Sep 29 2006 Andrew Overholt 3.2.1-3 - Add triggerpostun to deal with old rebuild-sdk-features postun crap (rh#207442, rh#207013). eclipse-bugzilla-1:0.2.4-3.fc6 ------------------------------ * Fri Sep 29 2006 Ben Konrath 0.2.4-3 - Remove Requires: eclipse-platform < 3.2.1. eclipse-cdt-1:3.1.1-1.fc6 ------------------------- * Thu Sep 28 2006 Jeff Johnston 3.1.1-1 - Rebase autotools to 0.0.5 source. - Rebase CDT to 3.1.1 source. - Bugzilla 206719, 206359, 206164 eclipse-changelog-1:2.3.2-1.fc6 ------------------------------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 Kyu Lee 2.3.2-1 - Imported fix for prepare changelog feature that did not work with Eclipse 3.2.1. - Also removed un-needed remove-pydev patch. ekiga-2.0.2-7 ------------- * Sat Sep 30 2006 Matthias Clasen - 2.0.2-7 - Make the status icon work in transparent panels esc-1.0.0-16.fc6 ---------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.0.0-16 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Fri Sep 22 2006 Jack Magne - 1.0.0-15 - Fix to the build version * Fri Sep 22 2006 Jack Magne - 1.0.0-14 - Fix to compile error in daemon evince-0.6.0-3.fc6 ------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6.0-3.fc6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 evolution-2.8.0-7.fc6 --------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.8.0-7.fc6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Thu Sep 21 2006 Matthew Barnes - 2.8.0-6.fc6 - Add patch for RH bug #205576 (message deletion in thread view). * Wed Sep 20 2006 Matthew Barnes - 2.8.0-5.fc6 - Add patch for Gnome.org bug #356811 (lingering file on uninstall). evolution-connector-2.8.0-3.fc6 ------------------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.8.0-3.fc6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 fontconfig-2.4.1-3.fc6 ---------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.4.1-3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 frysk-0.0.1.2006.10.02.rh1-1.fc6 -------------------------------- * Mon Oct 02 2006 Stepan Kasal - 0.0.1.2006.10.02.rh1-1 - New upstream version. * Tue Sep 26 2006 Stepan Kasal - 0.0.1.2006.09.22.rh1-1 - New upstream version. - Refresh frysk-xfail-2130.patch. - Add frysk-20060922-a-cast.patch to fix a warning. - Add fstack to the file list. gcalctool-5.8.24-2.fc6 ---------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Matthias Clasen - 5.8.24-2 - Fix a segfault in the or_IN locale due to careless string handling. (#208695) gcc-4.1.1-28 ------------ * Sat Sep 30 2006 Jakub Jelinek 4.1.1-28 - fix i386/x86_64 legitimize_pic_address with TLS symbols (PR target/29198) - fix gimplification of post-increment with side-effects on the inner expression (PR c/29154) gettext-0.14.6-3.fc6 -------------------- * Mon Oct 02 2006 Jens Petersen - 0.14.6-3 - buildrequire zip and unzip to fix libintl.jar multilib conflict (#205207) gjdoc-0.7.7-10 -------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.7.7-10 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 glibc-2.5-1 ----------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 Jakub Jelinek 2.5-1 - glibc 2.5 release gnome-applets-1:2.16.0.1-7.fc6 ------------------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1:2.16.0.1-7 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 gnome-python2-extras-2.14.2-4.fc6 --------------------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.14.2-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Fri Sep 22 2006 John (J5) Palmieri - 2.14.2-3 - Remove the Requires on the parent package from gtkmozembed so we don't pull in gnome-python2 also. At some point we should look at what requires gnome-python2 and only Require it for those sub packages and not the parent package. gnome-screensaver-2.16.0-7.fc6 ------------------------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.16.0-7.fc6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Thu Sep 28 2006 Ray Strode - 2.16.0-6.fc6 - don't busy loop if the smart card even message pipe isn't ready (bug 208018) gnome-user-share-0.10-5 ----------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.10-5 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 gnome-vfs2-2.16.0-4.fc6 ----------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.16.0-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 grub-0.97-13 ------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.97-13 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 gsf-sharp-0.8.1-2.fc6 --------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.8.1-2.fc6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 gtk2-2.10.4-4.fc6 ----------------- * Sat Sep 30 2006 Matthias Clasen - 2.10.4-4 - Avoid a possible segfault (gnome #358405) * Fri Sep 29 2006 Matthias Clasen - 2.10.4-3 - Fix a possible deadlock when not using the gnome-vfs filesystem backend * Sat Sep 23 2006 Matthias Clasen - 2.10.4-2 - Fix a problem with the search patch gzip-1.3.5-9 ------------ * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 1.3.5-9 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 hsqldb-1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.3 ----------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating 1:1.8.0.4-3jpp.3 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 icu-3.6-4 --------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 3.6-4 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 ifd-egate-0.05-15 ----------------- * Thu Sep 28 2006 Bob Relyea 0.05-15 - Fix slow hub issues im-chooser-0.3.3-2.fc6 ---------------------- * Mon Oct 02 2006 Akira TAGOH - 0.3.3-2 - added Assamese, Greek and Marathi translation. (#208258) * Mon Oct 02 2006 Akira TAGOH - 0.3.3-1 - Translations update release. (#208258, #208512) iproute-2.6.16-6.fc6 -------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 2.6.16-6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 ipsec-tools-0.6.5-6 ------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0.6.5-6 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 jakarta-commons-codec-0:1.3-7jpp.2 ---------------------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating 0:1.3-7jpp.2 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 jakarta-commons-pool-0:1.3-5jpp.1 --------------------------------- * Tue Sep 26 2006 Matt Wringe 1:1.3-5jpp.1 - Merge with upstream version. * Tue Sep 26 2006 Matt Wringe 1:1.3-5jpp - Add missing java-javadoc required and buildrequires. * Mon Sep 25 2006 Matt Wringe 1:1.3-4jpp.1 - Merge with upstream version jessie-0:1.0.1-7 ---------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 0:1.0.1-7 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 kbd-1.12-18 ----------- * Fri Sep 29 2006 Miloslav Trmac - 1.12-18 - Add a missing tilde to U+00E3 in latarcyrheb-sun16.psfu (#204470) kdebase-6:3.5.4-12.fc6 ---------------------- * Mon Oct 02 2006 Than Ngo Than Ngo 6:3.5.4-12 - fix #178320,#198828, follow menu-spec * Sun Oct 01 2006 Jesse Keating - 6:3.5.4-11 - rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21 * Tue Sep 26 2006 Than Ngo 6:3.5.4-10 - FedoraDNA for KDM - fix #205566, don't overwrite config files - fix #178320,#198828, follow menu-spec kdelibs-6:3.5.4-10.fc6 ---------------------- * Sun Oct 01 2006 Than Ngo 6:3.5.4-10 - fix utf8 issue in kdeprint - fix #178320,#198828, follow menu-spec - upstream patches, fix #106748, Evaluate scripts in