Firefox trademark shenanigans (Re: Any chance of getting Firefox 2.0 into rawhide/FC6?)
Steve Barnhart
stb52988 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 17 21:23:00 UTC 2006
I agree with option 4. Follow the current method and everyone quit
jumping on every renaming and forking bandwagon Debian seems to be
creating these days. I can't stand when people make a big deal over
little things. The license and issues haven't changed.
On 10/16/06, Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 16:31 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> > > Are those pictures of "Iceweasles" clogging up the Internets "series of
> > > tubes" I have been hearing so much about? ;]
> >
> > No. They are hedgehogs. In tubes.
>
> "Tubehog" would just be _the_ descriptive name for a widespread web
> browser.
>
> Nils
> --
> Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp at redhat.com
> "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
> Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
> PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
--
Steve
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list