*URGENT* Re: Another slip in the FC6 schedule

casimiro barreto casimiro.barreto at gmail.com
Wed Oct 18 13:22:03 UTC 2006


Fedora is fine to be used in most production environments and that is not
what will opose Fedora and RH-EL. When a company purchases RH-EL that means
that it is really interested in getting support, training and all the other
services RedHat provides (besides stable OS and applications).

Here in Brazil I´ve been working in environments where RH-EL is used for
intensive database applications (Oracle suite) mixed with some fedora
servers for DNS and things like that. The advantages in the use of Fedora is
that we are able to foresee things that will be available in next releases
of RH-EL.

I agree with the fact that using Fedora is important to assure that the
RH-EL is stable and performatic.

Regarding to the "ext3/jbd bug", I don´t think it is up for all the fuzz we
have seen in this list. It is around for sometime and nobody noticed it. The
fact that the issue came to discussion before the release of FC-6 simply
shows the commitment of Linux community in not hidding dirty issues under
the rugs and that this problem won´t be present in the next release of
RH-EL.

Best regards,

Casimiro


2006/10/18, Dmitry Butskoy <buc at odusz.so-cdu.ru>:
>
> Joachim Frieben wrote:
>
> >Better stick to the "CERN/RHEL" clone "Scientific Linux" then, right?
> >"Fedora" is by no means intended to comply with enterprise requirements.
> I
> >recommend that you have a look at:
> >
> >  http://fedora.redhat.com/about/rhel.html
> >
> >which explains the target audience of the respective distributions.
> "Fedora"
> >is intended for "Early adopters, enthusiasts, developers" ... This should
> >clarify things.
> >
> >
> It is a deadlock way for Fedora.
>
> "Enthusiasts and developers" means that Fedora will be used on their
> home computers/laptops etc. only, and *never* used in the production
> environment. But a lot of critical bugs can be found only by "production
> usage".
> If RHEL is based on Fedora, then Fedora must be stable enough for
> production systems too. Otherwise RHEL people should spent a lot of
> testing/laboratory etc. work itself, but even such a work does not
> guarantee that they will catch all the bugs possible...
>
> Dmitry Butskoy
> http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy
>
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>



-- 
The information contained in this message is confidential and
intended to the recipients specified in the headers. If you received
this message by error, notify the sender immediately. The
unauthorized use, disclosure, copy or alteration of this message
are strictly forbidden and subjected to civil and criminal sanctions.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20061018/8db91130/attachment.htm>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list