Xfce 4.4 call for testing

Kevin Fenzi kevin-redhat-devel at scrye.com
Fri Oct 6 17:15:17 UTC 2006


>>>>> "Patrice" == Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> writes:

>> We might revisit that idea in a few weeks if the devel/fc6 bits all
>> look good and stable, but it's a reasonably large undertaking to
>> update everything and gets the plugins and core bits in sync, etc.

Patrice> I, personally don't think it is worth having xfce 4.4 in
Patrice> fc5. Too much work and too much risk of breakage for little
Patrice> gain (I switched back and forth and I didn't saw much
Patrice> difference, except now there are icons but I don't use xfce
Patrice> for that ;-). However it should be good to have 4.4
Patrice> 'specific' apps in fc5, like exo, Terminal, thunar and so on
Patrice> (if they aren't there allready and there are no missing deps,
Patrice> of course).

Yeah, I can look at doing that at some point... although some of those
(Thunar in particular) might need newer libraries.

Patrice> -- Pat

kevin


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20061006/b9479f9f/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list