Firefox trademark shenanigans (Re: Any chance of getting Firefox 2.0 into rawhide/FC6?)

[Keith G]

When I posted the first 3 options I didn't realise that option 4 was
going to be possible.  If it is then I agree: Option 4.

On 17/10/06, Steve Barnhart <stb52988 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with option 4. Follow the current method and everyone quit
> jumping on every renaming and forking bandwagon Debian seems to be
> creating these days. I can't stand when people make a big deal over
> little things. The license and issues haven't changed.
>
> On 10/16/06, Nils Philippsen <nphilipp at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 16:31 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > > Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> > > > Are those pictures of "Iceweasles" clogging up the Internets "series of
> > > > tubes" I have been hearing so much about? ;]
> > >
> > > No.  They are hedgehogs.  In tubes.
> >
> > "Tubehog" would just be _the_ descriptive name for a widespread web
> > browser.
> >
> > Nils
> > --
> >      Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp at redhat.com
> > "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
> >  Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."  --  B. Franklin, 1759
> >  PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
> >
> > --
> > fedora-devel-list mailing list
> > fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
> >
>
>
> --
> Steve
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>