FC6 - Stock x86_64 stock install, installs about 158 i386/686 rpm's

[Hans de Goede]

Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Friday 27 October 2006 04:05, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> And (gee surprise) even here on the mailing list again noone responded
>> to my serious and motivated suggestion, that sucks and leads me to
>> believe that rpm (the foundation of our beloved distribution) is
>> currently an unmaintained piece of crap. Is it really? Does really no
>> one care about rpm??
> 
> No, it means our rpm maintainer hardly has time to read every message posted 
> to a very noisy fedora-devel list.  There is a devel list for rpm, there is 
> bugzilla.  Both are far better avenues than more noise on a very noisy list.
> 
> I make it part of my job to keep an eye on a few different Fedora lists, 
> watching for issues that may effect large amounts of userbase and making sure 
> we get them fixed or looked at for release blockers.  Its part of my job.  
> The same cannot be said about other developers within Red Hat.  This is why 
> things like bugzilla are better since that _is_ part of their job.
> 

You forgot to quote the part of my message with the bugzilla link, this
is already in bugzilla! I'm making noise about it on this list because I
want this to get some attention, and doing so through bugzilla has sofar
failed!

Regards,

Hans