firefox.i386 in x86_64 repo
Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Sun Sep 10 09:31:50 UTC 2006
Le samedi 09 septembre 2006 à 16:35 -0500, Callum Lerwick a écrit :
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:14 -0500, Jay Cliburn wrote:
> > This gets my vote. And I agree with your usefulness opinion. I've
> > never (knowingly) needed a 64-bit browser[*].
>
> Running an i386 app under compatibility, especially one with a large
> library stack like Firefox, adds noticeable startup lag and memory
> bloat, as an entirely separate i386 version of all the libraries has to
> be loaded.
My personal preference would be to install both versions under x86_64,
with the 64bit version the default one, and a plugin like the 'open page
in ie' windows users use to access the 32 bit version.
That is, until major plugins like flahs are available for 32 bit.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060910/3babb2ba/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list