KDE-LiveCD: gparted or qtparted?

[Sebastian Vahl]

Am Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:45:04 -0500
schrieb Steven Pritchard <steve at silug.org>:

> On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 11:33:46PM +0200, Sebastian Vahl wrote:
> > So the question here is: Are there good reasons for choosing
> > qtparted instead of gparted? Or is gtparted equal in functionality?
> 
> I'd think sticking with qtparted to get a common(-ish) look & feel
> would be best.

Don't think it's common look (maybe feel). It's pure qt :)
http://qtparted.sourceforge.net/screenshots.en.html

> 
> BTW, could someone verify that ntfs resizing actually works in the
> current Fedora qtparted?  It *should* be enabled, but I haven't had a
> chance to actually try it yet...

That's the background for this:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234082
And we've also decided to include them. But when resizing ntfs is not
working with qtparted, gparted would be the only choice.

Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070419/309b053c/attachment.sig>