JBoss and Fedora
aph at redhat.com
Fri Apr 6 15:35:16 UTC 2007
Nicolas Mailhot writes:
> Le vendredi 06 avril 2007 à 13:45 +0100, Andrew Haley a écrit :
> > Nicolas Mailhot writes:
> > > Le vendredi 06 avril 2007 à 11:07 +0100, Andrew Haley a écrit :
> > > > Nicolas Mailhot writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > the consensus seems to be it's more efficient to wait for the
> > > > > actual Java 7 SUN GPL release than make gcj feature-complete enough
> > > > > for JBoss.
> > > >
> > > > Really? The consensus among whom? I wonder what that's based on.
> > >
> > > The consensus as expressed by the Fedora Java team on this list in the
> > > past
> > I doubt it. I could only find one posting with the Google query
> > site://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/ jboss gcj
> > and that was from one "Nicolas Mailhot".
> Then it was on one of the other Linux & Java technical lists
> (fedora-maintainers, fedora-extras, fedora-devel-java,
> jpackage-discuss at zarb.org). Java team members participate in many
> different public forums, and I won't pretend I track each of their
It seems this consensus is rather fleeting.
> If you deem gcj ready for JBoss feel free to submit a set of JBoss
I'll be sure to let you know.
Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK
Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903
More information about the fedora-devel-list