actually, I'm serious: forbid bugzilla filing against FC4?

[Will Woods]

On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:18 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 12:00:03PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > That's good for now, give or take the what-to-do-with-5-and-6 issue. But
> > > what about when Fedora 7 is obsolete? Eventually, I'll get tired and you'll
> > > have to find someone else who finds twisted pleasure in closing bug reports
> > > filed against unmaintained releases. :)
> > You should join in the next Fedora QA meeting and we can talk about
> > overall future bugzilla strategy.
> 
> Depending on the time, sure.
> 
> The wiki says to see fedora-test-list for meeting announcements, but I can't
> find a recent announcement in the archives... perhaps I'm not looking hard
> enough.

They're Thursdays at 1600UTC (currently Noon EDT). Check out the
#fedora-meeting schedule page:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/FedoraMeetingChannel

As for the Grand Future of bugzilla, I think we were talking about
mass-moving bugs from 'devel' to (say) 'f8-pre' when F8 gets released.
Maybe when F7 is EOL'd we can mass-move all the f7 and f7-pre bugs to a
different product (Fedora Pasture) that's closed for bugs.

Maybe?

-w
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070411/ec32cedb/attachment.sig>