actually, I'm serious: forbid bugzilla filing against FC4?

[Benny Amorsen]

>>>>> "MM" == Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> writes:

MM> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:01:27PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> > How bad of a performance problem is it to have a bunch of bugs in
>> CLOSED > or NEEDINFO state against devel? Does it matter? Searching
>> would suck if you include these states. Also it's not helpful if

MM> Things which stay in needinfo too long should get closed as
MM> INSUFFICIENT_DATA. When a release is obsoleted, all bugs in the
MM> devel version which were closed in the timeframe of that release
MM> could be moved to the Fedora Pasture as well.

I have bug 172776 stuck in NEEDINFO. It should be easy to reproduce
and it has been with us since FC4 (still there in FC6; I don't know if
it is in FC7). All needed information should be there; I have received
no further requests for information since I answered on the 27th of
January.

If NEEDINFO bugs are automatically closed, we will lose bug reports
like that one.


/Benny