actually, I'm serious: forbid bugzilla filing against FC4?

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Sun Apr 15 03:22:07 UTC 2007


On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 09:23:03PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 01:20:30AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > If there's not an easy bugzilla feature to turn off new bugs for a given
> > > version,
> > I think all you have to do is give bugzilla the new range of versions,
> > e.g. simply remove the non desired one from the config. Since the
> > database backend wires in the actual text of the version into the bug
> > report, it doesn't matter whether some records contain versions that
> > semantically cannot be set to anymore. Maybe that was even the plan
> > behind this design.
> 
> Except how do you query for closed bugs against the version, then?

Good catch! My suggestion was to short-sighted - one could split the
version list for new bugs and for querying bugs, but that now sounds
far worse than moving versions over to another closed product.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070415/7e7f4da0/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list