packaging thunderbird and firefox extensions as RPM in Fedora
Christopher Aillon
caillon at redhat.com
Mon Apr 16 18:01:54 UTC 2007
Enrico Scholz wrote:
> I do not see how this matters here. rpm knows enough ways to handle it:
>
> * explicit 'Requires: firefox = ...' in binary plugins
Packagers fall all too easily into the trap of >= and not updating the
min/max versions based on what the extension claims. When ABI breaks,
it will probably cause a crash and users might revert back to an older
browser version which might not have the latest security fixes.
> * perhaps virtual provides to handle changes in firefox micro versions
> * perhaps an XSL stylesheet which generates autodeps based upon the
> 'minVersion' and 'maxVersion' values in 'install.rdf'
This might work, but seems hackish and it will be made a moot point for
F8 when there'll be a better way of doing things.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list