License problem with JPGraph

[Rahul Sundaram]

Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 11:48 -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 09:55:09AM +0200, Steven Bakker wrote:
>>>         Licensee) For non-commercial, open-source or educational use and
>>>         JpGraph Professional License for commercial use.
>>>
>>> So QPL applies for (non-commercial || open-source || educational) use.
>>> I'd say Fedora fits in the "open-source" category.
>> I would read that as "no commercial open source"  || "educational", otherwise
>> it makes no sense. Commercial and open source are not exclusive.
> 
> FYI this package has been pulled already.

Doesn't that require a announcement? We did that for Xara.

Rahul